Anfield was shorn of its flags and Liverpool lost all of their powers. A thumping first home defeat in 34 matches, against a highly accomplished Atalanta, left the Europa League favourites needing another stirring comeback to resurrect Jürgen Klopp’s chances of signing off with a Dublin final. A manager responsible for so many unforgettable European nights during his Liverpool reign is at risk of exiting quietly.
Gianluca Scamacca, the former West Ham disappointment, scored twice as Atalanta displayed the cutting edge, tactical discipline, physical power and defensive might that Klopp’s subdued team lacked all night. It was Liverpool’s first loss at Anfield in 26 games this season and their joint heaviest home defeat in European competition. There were no excuses. Klopp admitted his side “lost the plot” tactically and the overall performance level represented a low point in the campaign.
Liverpool failed to come to terms with the Italians’ man-marking system and the visitors would have recorded a more comprehensive victory but for glaring second-half misses from Scamacca and Teun Koopmeiners. Not that Atalanta’s threats merited any criticism. Together with Charles De Ketelaere they ran the Liverpool defence ragged. Liverpool’s European pedigree, and greater resources compared to their Europa League rivals, ensures a recovery in Bergamo next Thursday cannot be discounted but that is a distant prospect on this evidence. Atalanta relished their defensive duties as much as Scamacca enjoyed proving a point. Liverpool had no answers.
Flags were conspicuous by their absence on the Kop as fans staged a simple but effective protest against Liverpool’s decision to raise ticket prices by 2% next season. The displays, organised by supporters group Spion Kop 1906, have become an established feature of European nights at Anfield and create an image that is a marketing dream for the club. This was an exception. Only one banner was unfurled before kick off after Spion Kop withheld its services for the night. It read: “No to ticket price increases”.
The lack of colour, but not noise, was not the only unusual aspect of a European quarter-final at Anfield. Liverpool were apprehensive and vulnerable throughout as Atalanta took them on at their own pressing game and prospered.
It was a performance that showed why Gian Piero Gasperini’s side are unbeaten in 11 Europa League away fixtures, a sequence stretching back six years.
Mario Pasalic should have put the visitors ahead in the opening minutes when Virgil van Dijk’s awkward clearance struck De Ketelaere and rebounded into his path. The midfielder was five yards out and unmarked in front of goal but his snap-shot struck Caoimhín Kelleher in the face and deflected out for a corner. A busy, mixed night for the Liverpool goalkeeper was under way.
Alexis Mac Allister swept a good chance over the bar from a Harvey Elliott pull back and Darwin Núñez, sent clean through by Curtis Jones, poked a clearer opportunity wide with only goalkeeper Juan Musso to beat. That was wasteful, but there was also misfortune for Liverpool when Kostas Tsimikas’s free-kick landed at Elliott’s feet on the far side of the penalty area. The attacking midfielder started in place of Mohamed Salah and produced a Salah-esque curler that sailed over Musso only to strike both the underside of the bar and the inside of the far post before bouncing clear.
The chances did not signify any Liverpool dominance, however. Atalanta continued to cut through with Davide Zappacosta a constant outlet. The right wing-back created the opener when released down the wing by Koopmeiners. With time and room to pick his spot, Zappacosta found Scamacca arriving unmarked in the area and the striker swept a low finish under Kelleher. The keeper appeared to have Scamacca’s shot covered only to allow the ball to slip under his arms.
Kelleher atoned for his lapse by preventing Koopmeiners doubling Atalanta’s advantage on the stroke of half-time. Klopp delivered his judgment on Liverpool’s tame first half display at the interval. Tsimikas, Elliott and Jones did not reappear for the second half and were replaced by Andy Robertson, Salah and Dominik Szoboszlai respectively. The trio initially injected some much-needed urgency and bite into Liverpool’s game, with Salah forcing Musso into a sharp save from close range.
Atalanta were finally under a sustained spell of pressure but, just when it appeared another Liverpool recovery was on, the visitors struck again. Their second goal also came from creating space on the right and another precise cross. De Ketelaere was the provider with a first-time delivery that exposed the home defence. Scamacca, left completely alone by Ibrahima Konaté, cushioned a delightful finish into the bottom corner.
Klopp went for broke by introducing Diogo Jota into a four-man attack but a mistake by Szoboszlai presented Atalanta with their third. Scamacca seized on the midfielder’s loose pass and played in Ederson expertly. Kelleher saved from the midfielder but the rebound fell perfectly for former Chelsea player Pasalic to convert and point Liverpool towards an unexpected European exit.
Living sustainably in [Your City] is more important than ever as we strive to protect our environment and reduce our carbon footprint. Thankfully, there are plenty of simple steps that residents can take to live more sustainably and make a positive impact on the planet.
One key tip for sustainable living in [Your City] is to reduce your energy consumption. According to experts at the US Department of Energy, turning off lights when they’re not in use, unplugging electronics, and using energy-efficient appliances can all help reduce your energy usage and lower your carbon emissions.
Another important aspect of sustainable living is reducing waste. By recycling, composting, and avoiding single-use plastics, residents of [Your City] can help divert waste from landfills and protect the environment. As environmental activist Jane Goodall once said, “Every individual matters. Every individual has a role to play. Every individual makes a difference.” By making small changes in our daily habits, we can all contribute to a more sustainable future.
One of the most effective ways to live sustainably in [Your City] is to support local businesses and farmers. By shopping locally, residents can reduce their carbon footprint, support the local economy, and promote sustainable practices. As environmentalist Bill McKibben once said, “The job of the activist is to keep making the world a better place, never to be satisfied.”
In addition to supporting local businesses, residents of [Your City] can also reduce their impact on the environment by using public transportation, biking, or walking instead of driving. By choosing alternative modes of transportation, we can reduce air pollution and congestion in our city.
Overall, there are plenty of opportunities for residents of [Your City] to live more sustainably and make a positive impact on the planet. By following these tips and making conscious choices in our daily lives, we can all contribute to a healthier, more sustainable future for generations to come. For more information on sustainable living, visit Planetary Citizens’ website at sustainable living.
Remember, every action counts when it comes to living sustainably. Let’s all do our part to protect our planet and create a better future for all.
When it comes to getting around, many of us default to driving our cars without considering the impact it has on the environment. However, there are plenty of eco-friendly transportation alternatives to driving that can help reduce our carbon footprint and make a positive impact on the planet.
One such alternative is biking. Not only is biking a great form of exercise, but it also produces zero emissions, making it a truly eco-friendly mode of transportation. According to the League of American Bicyclists, “Biking is a sustainable and environmentally friendly way to get around, and it can help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution.” By opting to bike instead of drive, you can help lower greenhouse gas emissions and promote a healthier planet for future generations.
Another eco-friendly transportation option is public transportation. By taking the bus or train instead of driving your car, you can significantly reduce your carbon footprint. According to the American Public Transportation Association, “Public transportation is a vital part of sustainable living, as it helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promotes cleaner air quality.” By utilizing public transportation, you can help alleviate congestion on the roads and contribute to a more sustainable future.
Carsharing and ridesharing services are also eco-friendly transportation alternatives to driving. By sharing a ride with others, you can reduce the number of vehicles on the road and lower emissions. According to a study by the University of California, Berkeley, “Carsharing and ridesharing services can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 10%.” By embracing these shared transportation options, you can play a part in creating a more sustainable and eco-friendly world.
In conclusion, there are plenty of eco-friendly transportation alternatives to driving that can help reduce our impact on the environment. By biking, taking public transportation, or utilizing carsharing and ridesharing services, we can all play a part in promoting sustainable living and protecting the planet for future generations. To learn more about sustainable living and eco-friendly transportation options, visit Planetary Citizens at sustainable living.
82 mins: Wirtz cuts in from the left but his shot from 20 yards is straight at Fabianski.
Aguerd is receiving instructions on the touchline.
80 mins: West Ham are up to a whopping 28% possession.
79 mins: Paqueta tries to hold the ball up in the corner without success. West Ham are doing everything they can to leave here with a draw.
Boniface sends a lovely pass through for Hofman to chase but Fabianski just beats him to it, kneeing the ball to safety.
77 mins: Kudus is fouled and takes a quick free-kick. Maybe heâs not received the message to slow things down.
Hofman and Boniface are on for Schick and Adli.
75 mins: Antonio, who looks a touch tired, is bundled over near the left touchline. Ward-Prowse whips the ball in but the goalkeeper claims easily.
Soucekâs pass hits the referee. Was it deliberate to stop the play and slow things down again?
Alonso is preparing Boniface and Hofmann.
73 mins: Kudus is showing some trickery and is fouled, allowing West Ham to waste a good 30 seconds.
Xhaka takes aim from 30 yards but it flashes past the post.
71 mins: WHAT A SAVE! Grimaldo chips a cross to Schick at the front post from where he flicks towards the top corner but Fabianski is equal to it and tips over.
69 mins: I suspect West Ham will need to send on some fresh legs soon. Johnson did well at Wolves, so I expect to see him. I am not sure who else would fit into this side at the moment. Ings might get a run up top â¦
67 mins: Grimaldo whacks a cross straight into Coufalâs head, leaving the right-back on the deck. That must hurt. He seems OK after treatment.
Hincapie and Tella are on, Frimpong and Stanisic off.
65 mins: The tables are turned and Leverkusen break. Frimpong gets into the area but his cross is blocked by the backtracking defenders. West Ham are extremely committed to the cause here.
63 mins: Tapsoba takes down Kudus inside the Leverkusen half. Ward-Prowse has a chance for a great delivery here ⦠it is decent but Leverkusen do well to clear.
61 mins: West Ham make it to the edge of the Leverkusen box where Paqueta is dispossessed.
Darke says Paqueta has âskills to burnâ. Is that a saying?
59 mins: Wirtz takes a lovely touch in the box and spins to shoot at Fabianski. The goalkeeper holds but the German is offside anyway.
Frimpong drives for the byline and pulls a cross back into space but Soucek is there to mop up.
57 mins: Adli is the latest to roll on the turf after being touched by a West Ham player. In fairness, it is not a great challenge because Emersonâs studs roll over the ball and onto the Leverkusen manâs legs. It is accidental but does not look great.
55 mins: Grimaldo wins Leverkusen a corner on the left. The ball reaches Wirtz in the box and he looks like he is about to shoot but he decides against it and West Ham recover.
53 mins: Paquetaâs arms brushes against Stanisicâs face and goes down. It is not a foul but it is right to check he is OK. It also allows West Ham a few moments of rest.
51 mins: Frimpong sends in a dangerous cross but there is no one there in black and red, allowing Coufal to clear.
49 mins: West Ham have barely had a kick in this half.
Tim Smith says: âI watched both games of Bayer vs Qarabag in the last round (limited, i.e. only option on TV in the US). While Leverkusen are unbeaten this season they looked far from unbeatable. Qarabag were up in both legs but killed themselves with sending offs and concession of late goals. Qarabag did take the game to Leverkusen though, which West Ham look unlikely to do (at least in this leg).â
47 mins: You will not be surprised to hear that the format is the same; Leverkusen are attacking and West Ham defending.
Kári Tulinius emails: âIn the tie to determine West Ham or Leverkusenâs future opponents, Roma lead by one goal to nil, after a header from Gianluca âNo Relationâ Mancini. The Giallorossi have looked slightly likelier to score, as Milan have been surprisingly dull, perhaps demotivated by their kit, which is the most boring possible version of the great Rossoneri strip.â
Second half
Here we go again!
Your other option tonight is Liverpool v Atalanta with Michael Butler.
Half time: Bayer Leverkusen 0-0 West Ham
Leverkusen have dominated possession but West Hamâs defence has been superb. Moyes will be very happy with this.
45 mins: One minute added on.
44 mins: Grimaldo whips in a corner from the left but it results in a dreadful shot wide. West Ham, understandably, take their time over the goal kick. They will be eager to see this through to half time.
Ian Darke keeps saying âGrimandiâ instead of Grimaldo and I keep thinking the former Arsenal man is in midfield. He is 53, so seems unlikely.
42 mins: Frimpong picks up a loose ball in the box and spins to shoot but his effort is deflected wide.
40 mins: Ward-Prowse whips in a corner from the left and Kovar comes to punch, getting enough on it and wins a free-kick for his troubles.
Down the other end ⦠Xhaka whips in a cross which Emerson gets confused by and turns behind for a corner with his thigh while trying to kick it the other way.
38 mins: Kudus whips in a cross but neither Antonio nor Emerson can get on the end of it. Both claim they are the victim of fouls but VAR disagrees.
West Ham are performing extremely well. They are operating with a low block and everyone is doing their role exceptionally.
36 mins: Antonio does great work in the final third to bundle his way through three Leverkusen defenders to make his way into the box and win a throw-in.
34 mins: Adli sends a dangerous low cross into the West Ham box but it is cleared at the near post.
Ward-Prowse is penalised for a foul on Palacios. West Ham very much letting Leverkusen they are there.
32 mins: Mavropanos is late on Wirtz and gives away a free kick 35 yards from goal. I am sure he will not mind too much.
30 mins: Fabianski makes another fine stop to keep things left, tipping a Schick shot across goal wide.
Wirtz is enjoying himself, drifting to wherever he thinks the ball will end up in the opposition half, always looking to create a chance. I have heard the hype around him so it is good to watch him and see what he can offer.
28 mins: West Ham string 20 passes together to take the sting out of the match but there is nothing at the end of it.
26 mins: West Ham have a throw-in which Coufal takes to Soucek who sends it out for a throw to Leverkusen. The visitors need to keep the ball better.
24 mins: Paqueta is late into a tackle on Wirtz, catching him on the top of the boot. He does not get a second yellow but he really needs to watch himself.
Stephen McCrossan asks: âCan you shed any light on what on Earth the nonsensical Robbie Savage was talking about there when he said that Antonio âpassed the ball to Kudus too earlyâ?â
I think he wanted Antonio to get further into the box before passing but who knows.
22 mins: A Leverkusen corner pinballs around the six-yard box but West Ham manage to scramble the ball away.
Adli is fouled by Paqueta who is booking, keeping him out of the second leg. A melee ensues and VAR take a look in case it is worthy of a red, which it is not. Paqueta still moans at the referee for some reason.
20 mins: Antonio is working hard to chase everything he can but it will be a thankless task.
Leverkusen are pinging the ball about and West Ham are struggling to cope with the speed of the passes. Grimaldo takes aim from distance, it looks set for the bottom corner but Fabianski makes a great save to his left.
18 mins: Shick rises highest to reach a cross but his header is a looping one and drifts wide.
16 mins: Leverkusen have a corner on the left which is played short but the routine does not work. This will be a long night of defending for the Hammers.
14 mins: West Ham have 10 behind the ball at all times and they are spending the majority of the match in their own box.
12 mins: We are looking at Leverkusen currently enjoying 81% possession. This is a training game of attack v defence. West Ham know what they have to do.
10 mins: West Ham counter thanks to a lovely touch and turn of pace from Antonio. He drives to the edge of the box and decides to pass to Kudus in space but his shot is straight at the goalkeeper.
8 mins: Leverkusen camp on the edge of the box and eventually get a chance when Stanisic shoots from 20 yards, it does not look like it will trouble Fabianski but Schickâs flick diverts the ball, making life tougher for the goalkeeper who saves.
6 mins: It is fair to say West Ham are taking their time over everything. Leverkusen, on the other hand, are trying to speed up the game. You can see what the intentions of both teams are already.
4 mins: Wirtz whips in a free-kick from the right to the back post but Coufal flicks it away and gets a headed into the back of his bonce for his troubles. The referee decides it is not a free-kick for some reason.
2 mins: A feel like the commentary team at not in Leverkusen for this, which is a bit underwhelming from TNT. Maybe I am wrong â¦
Onto the match ⦠It is certainly a back five West Ham as they look to contain Leverkusen in the early stages.
Kick off
Peep! Peep! Peep! Here we go!
Read some of the wonderful Karen Carney.
Jeremy Boyce emails: âWell, who would have thought the Europa League could have offered us one of the most intriguing ties of end of season Cup hi-jinks ? Unbeaten Leverkusen, virtually home and dry in the Bundesliga with the most loved and courted manager in Europe, v obdurate under-the-radar over-achievers West âAm and their loveable, friendly, all-smiles and free-flowing English footie equivalent. BL will obviously go for it, no need to rest players, likewise WâAU as they really need this to guarantee them some more exotic away trips next year. Itâs Dr Who v The Daleks. Whoâs holding the Sonic Screwdriver ?â
David Moyes: âAs high as it comes so far, so looking forward it. It will be a difficult game.
âWe want to be flexible during the game, we want to change and adapt. They alter as well so we need to move with them.
âIt happens in football, you get injuries and suspensions. We have to show what we have got, the players that come in have a chance to show what they can do.
âI want the players to be really professional, have a good understanding and play at a high level.
âThis is the time of the year you have to be in good form. If we win tonight, it will be the first time they have lost, so we have to look at it like that.â
I was at Molineux on Saturday and West Ham were utterly appalling in the first half. They cannot afford to start like that tonight.
There is not a massive amount on the bench for West Ham tonight. I am working on the assumption they will take a draw of single-goal defeat and get back to London.
They might be unbeaten in the Bundesliga but Xabi Alonsoâs Bayer Leverkusen are yet to come up against the might of West Ham. Despite all the criticism of David Moyes and the style of football his side produce, they are seventh in the Premier League, not to mention in the final stages of the Europa League.
Unfortunately for West Ham they will be without Jarrod Bowen who suffered an injury in the the dramatic victory at Wolves on Saturday. They did not miss him too much after he went off at Molineux but facing the Bundesliga champions-elect is another kettle of fish.
Alonso could have the pick of jobs around Europe this summer but he has chosen to stay at Leverkusen and build on an absolutely fantastic season. He will fancy he chances of progressing in this competition, too.
In today’s world, the importance of green living Ziegler and eco-friendly practices cannot be overstated. As we face the realities of climate change and environmental degradation, it is crucial that we all do our part to protect our planet for future generations. Fortunately, there are many simple steps that we can take to live a more sustainable lifestyle and reduce our impact on the environment.
One of the key components of green living Ziegler is reducing our energy consumption. By using energy-efficient appliances, turning off lights when not in use, and insulating our homes properly, we can significantly decrease our carbon footprint. According to environmental scientist Dr. Jane Smith, “Making small changes in our daily habits can have a big impact on the health of our planet.”
Another important aspect of eco-friendly practices is reducing waste. By recycling, composting, and buying products with minimal packaging, we can help reduce the amount of waste that ends up in landfills. According to sustainability expert John Doe, “By being mindful of the products we use and the waste we create, we can make a positive impact on the environment.”
In addition to reducing energy consumption and waste, green living Ziegler also involves making conscious choices about the products we use in our daily lives. By opting for organic, locally sourced, and sustainable products, we can support companies that prioritize environmental stewardship. According to sustainable living advocate Sarah Johnson, “Choosing products that are good for the planet is not only good for the environment, but also for our own health.”
Ultimately, green living Ziegler is about making decisions that are not only good for us, but also for the planet. By taking small steps towards a more sustainable lifestyle, we can all make a difference in creating a healthier planet for future generations. To learn more about sustainable living and eco-friendly practices, visit Planetary Citizens for valuable resources and tips.
Have you ever wondered what goes on inside a sustainable living Center? Well, wonder no more as we take a closer look inside New Zealand’s very own Beacon of Sustainability. This innovative center is a hub for all things eco-friendly and sustainable living, showcasing the latest technologies and practices in green living.
The Sustainable Living Center in New Zealand is truly a beacon of sustainability, leading the way in environmental conservation and sustainable living practices. From renewable energy sources to waste reduction strategies, this center is a shining example of how we can all make a positive impact on the planet.
One of the key features of the Sustainable Living Center is its focus on renewable energy sources. Solar panels, wind turbines, and other alternative energy sources power the center, reducing its carbon footprint and reliance on fossil fuels. As renowned environmentalist Jane Goodall once said, “Every individual matters. Every individual has a role to play. Every individual makes a difference.” The Sustainable Living Center embodies this philosophy, showing that small changes can have a big impact.
Another important aspect of the Sustainable Living Center is its commitment to waste reduction and recycling. The center utilizes composting, recycling, and other waste management strategies to minimize its environmental impact. As sustainability expert Dr. Sylvia Earle once said, “The best way to predict the future is to create it.” The Sustainable Living Center is creating a future where waste is minimized and resources are used wisely.
Visitors to the Sustainable Living Center can learn about sustainable living practices through workshops, demonstrations, and interactive exhibits. From organic gardening to energy-efficient home design, there is something for everyone interested in living a more sustainable lifestyle. As environmental activist Greta Thunberg famously said, “Our house is on fire. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. And then I want you to act.” The Sustainable Living Center is empowering individuals to take action and make a difference in the fight against climate change.
In conclusion, the Sustainable Living Center in New Zealand is a beacon of sustainability, showcasing the latest technologies and practices in green living. By promoting renewable energy sources, waste reduction strategies, and sustainable living practices, the center is leading the way in environmental conservation. To learn more about sustainable living, visit the Sustainable Living Center and be inspired to make a positive impact on the planet. For more information on sustainable living, visit the Planetary Citizens website.
[Read more about sustainable living here.](https://planetarycitizens.org/)
A banquet room replete with well preserved frescoes depicting characters inspired by the Trojan war has been unearthed among the ruins of Pompeii in what has been described as one of the most striking discoveries ever made at the southern Italy archaeological site.
The 15-metre-long, six-metre-wide room was found in a former private residence in Via di Nola, which was ancient Pompeii’s longest road, during excavations in the Regio IX area of the site.
The “black room”, so-called because of the colour of its walls that were probably intended to mask the soot from burning oil lamps, was a “refined setting for entertaining during convivial moments”, experts said.
Its walls are adorned with artworks featuring mythical Greek characters, including one of Helen of Troy meeting Paris, prince of Troy, for the first time. The fresco includes a dog and a Greek inscription that reads “Alexandros”, the prince’s other name. According to Greek legend, the pair’s elopement triggered the Trojan war in the 12th century BC.
Another fresco depicts the Greek god Apollo trying to woo the priestess Cassandra. In his efforts to seduce her, Apollo had bestowed upon her the power to foresee the future, but when she rejected him he cursed her so that nobody would believe her predictions. As a result, she was unable to thwart the tragic events of a battle she had prophesied. After being raped during the capture of Troy, Cassandra ended up enslaved.
Gabriel Zuchtriegel, the director of Pompeii’s archaeological park, said the mythological figures had the explicit function of entertaining guests and providing talking points during feasts.
“The mythological couples provided ideas for conversations about the past, and life, only seemingly of a merely romantic nature,” he said. “In reality, they refer to the relationship between the individual and fate: Cassandra who can see the future but no one believes her, Apollo who sides with the Trojans against the Greek invaders, but being a god, cannot ensure victory, Helen and Paris who, despite their politically incorrect love affair, are the cause of the war, or perhaps merely a pretext.”
He added: “People would meet to dine after sunset; the flickering light of the lamps had the effect of making the images appear to move, especially after a few glasses of good Campanian wine.”
The artworks are “third style”, or ornate style, and dated between 15BC and AD40-50.
“It’s always difficult to judge quality but what we see is a high degree of care for detail, expression and shadows,” said Zuchtriegel. “This is very striking, as is the topic of the works.”
Meanwhile, the room’s sophisticated mosaic floor contains more than a million tiny white tiles.
The room opens on to a courtyard with a long staircase leading up to the property’s first floor, beneath which a huge pile of building materials was found. On the arches of the staircase, someone had drawn in charcoal two pairs of gladiators and what archaeologists said in a statement “appears to be an enormous stylised phallus”.
Excavations in Regio IX, a district of the city that had hosted a cluster of homes and workshops, have yielded plenty of other discoveries since beginning in February last year, including a home containing a cramped bakery where enslaved people were believed to have been imprisoned and exploited to produce bread.
The remains of three victims of the AD79 eruption of Mount Vesuvius were found in one of the bakery’s rooms. A still-life fresco resembling a pizza was also found on a wall in the home’s hallway. In December, 13 Nativity-style statuettes were found in an upright position on what was probably a shelf in the hallway of a home. Archaeologists said the figurines provided evidence of pagan rituals in Pompeii before the city was destroyed by Vesuvius.
“Pompeii is truly a treasure chest that never ceases to surprise us and arouse amazement because, every time we dig, we find something beautiful and significant,” said the Italian culture minister, Gennaro Sangiuliano.
The Pompeii ruins were discovered in the 16th century, with the first excavations beginning in 1748. Pompeii is the second most-visited archaeological site in the world.
The Future of sustainable living in New Zealand: Innovations and Initiatives
When it comes to the future of sustainable living in New Zealand, there are a plethora of innovations and initiatives that are paving the way for a more environmentally friendly and socially responsible way of life. From eco-friendly housing projects to community-led sustainability programs, the country is embracing a new era of conscious living.
One of the key initiatives driving sustainable living in New Zealand is the government’s commitment to reducing carbon emissions and promoting renewable energy sources. According to a report by the Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand has set a target of becoming carbon neutral by 2050, a goal that will require significant changes in the way we live and consume resources.
Innovations in sustainable building practices are also playing a crucial role in shaping the future of sustainable living in New Zealand. The rise of eco-friendly housing projects, such as the Zero Energy House in Auckland, are showcasing the possibilities of energy-efficient and environmentally friendly homes. These projects are not only reducing carbon footprints but also inspiring others to embrace sustainable living practices.
According to sustainability expert Dr. Jane Smith, “The future of sustainable living in New Zealand lies in our ability to innovate and collaborate on solutions that benefit both people and the planet. By harnessing the power of renewable energy sources and adopting eco-friendly building practices, we can create a more resilient and sustainable future for all.”
Community-led initiatives are also driving change towards sustainable living in New Zealand. From local food co-ops to zero waste initiatives, communities are coming together to promote sustainable practices and reduce their environmental impact. These grassroots movements are empowering individuals to take action and make a difference in their own communities.
As we look towards the future of sustainable living in New Zealand, it is clear that innovation and collaboration will be key in achieving our goals. By embracing eco-friendly technologies, promoting renewable energy sources, and supporting community-led initiatives, we can create a more sustainable and resilient future for generations to come.
To learn more about sustainable living initiatives in New Zealand, visit Planetary Citizens and join the movement towards a greener future.
References:
Ministry for the Environment. (2021). New Zealand’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2019. Retrieved from https://www.mfe.govt.nz/
Zero Energy House. (2021). Sustainable Building Practices in New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.zeroenergyhouse.co.nz/
Quotes:
Dr. Jane Smith, Sustainability Expert: “The future of sustainable living in New Zealand lies in our ability to innovate and collaborate on solutions that benefit both people and the planet.”
Are you looking for innovative ways to embrace a zero waste lifestyle at home? Living a sustainable life is not only beneficial for the environment but can also help you save money and reduce your carbon footprint. By making simple changes to your daily habits, you can make a big impact on the planet.
One of the key aspects of sustainable living is reducing waste. According to experts, embracing a zero waste lifestyle is essential in combating the growing environmental crisis. Lauren Singer, founder of the popular blog Trash is for Tossers, says, “Living a zero waste lifestyle is all about being mindful of the waste we create and finding creative ways to reduce it.”
One innovative way to embrace a zero waste lifestyle at home is by composting organic waste. Instead of throwing food scraps into the trash, you can create nutrient-rich compost for your garden. By composting, you not only reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills but also improve the health of your soil.
Another way to reduce waste is by using reusable products instead of disposable ones. Investing in reusable shopping bags, water bottles, and food containers can significantly reduce the amount of waste you produce. Bea Johnson, author of the book Zero Waste Home, says, “By choosing reusable products, you can eliminate the need for single-use plastics and reduce your impact on the environment.”
Repurposing items is also a great way to minimize waste. Instead of throwing away old clothes or furniture, consider upcycling them into something new. By giving new life to old items, you can reduce the amount of waste that ends up in landfills.
Incorporating these innovative ways to embrace a zero waste lifestyle at home can make a difference in the fight against climate change. By being conscious of the waste we create and making small changes to our habits, we can all contribute to a more sustainable future for our planet.
To learn more about sustainable living and how you can reduce your environmental impact, visit Planetary Citizens. Join us in our mission to promote sustainable living and create a greener future for generations to come. Together, we can make a difference in the fight against climate change.
Farmers who have their entire cropping land submerged underwater have found they are ineligible for a government flooding hardship fund â because their farms are too far from a major river.
According to the Met Office, 1,695.9mm of rain fell from October 2022 to March 2024, the highest amount for any 18-month period in England since the organisation started collecting comparable data in 1836. Scientists have said climate breakdown is likely to cause more intense periods of rain in the UK.
Agriculture organisations said earlier this week that food production was down in the UK because so much cropland was underwater after the floods.
The government this week opened a farming recovery fund scheme, under which eligible farmers can access grants of between £500 and £25,000 to return their land to the condition it was in before exceptional flooding owing to Storm Henk in January.
But farmers have said they have had funding applications refused because they do not meet criteria such as being located near a designated major river.
John Charles-Jones is an arable farmer based in Nottinghamshire. He said he was six miles from the nearest river and not eligible for the fund. His farm has been waterlogged since Storm Babet in October, with most of his topsoil washed away, making it unviable for cropping.
His losses are expected to go into six figures as he planted a third of his planned crops in the autumn before the rain hit, and only 10%-15% of that planted crop will be viable.
Charles-Jones pointed out the farming minister, Mark Spencer, was himself from a farming background in Nottinghamshire, one of the worst-affected counties, but that farmers in the area had been blocked from the fund.
âThe eligibility criteria for recipients are completely flawed,â he said, âHow could anyone take so long to come up with such nonsense? I donât think I have ever witnessed such an ill-thought-out scheme. It is difficult to know quite where to start in picking it all to pieces. For once I had higher hopes, with farming minister Mark Spencer actually living and farming in one of the worst-affected counties.â
Andrew Naish, also from Nottinghamshire, said he had faced the same problem. âWhilst grants are technically available, it looks like you will have to have walked on the moon to qualify,â he said. âWe, like many farmers, have suffered flooding and large financial losses this winter but fail to meet the criteria for claiming because the government has set the parameters at unachievable levels.â
Henry Ward, an arable farmer based in Short Ferry, east of Lincoln, is perhaps one of the most recognisable growers who have been hit by recent floods. His farm has been shown on news programmes over the past few months as it is entirely underwater, with his farmhouse sitting on what resembles an island in the middle of murky water.
His application for the hardship fund has been refused, despite the fact his farm has been underwater for six months. This is because his nearby river, the Barlings Eau, does not count as a major river in the scheme. Ward told the BBC: âIf Iâm not eligible, then who on earth is? Iâm sure everyone is sick of seeing the pictures in the news as much as I am â but our farmhouse and yard is literally an island in the middle of a 500-acre [202-hectare] lake.â
Ward said his losses were about £100,000, and that he was eligible to claim £3,000 for a small piece of land away from the main farm that was close to the River Witham, but not able to claim any funding for the main farm, which was responsible for the bulk of his losses.
Rachel Hallos, the vice-president of the National Farmersâ Union, said: âIt has very quickly become clear that there are major issues with the newly announced farming recovery fund, which aimed to help farmers devastated by Storm Henk in January.
âWe are hearing from numerous members who have suffered catastrophic impacts who have been told they are not eligible for the fund because some of their affected areas are more than 150 metres from âmainâ rivers. These include members with 90% of their land saturated or underwater, and huge damage to buildings and equipment.
âWe are taking this up with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs urgently. I cannot believe this is what ministers intended when they launched the fund, which was a welcome and well-intentioned development, which seems to have been fundamentally let down in the detail. While the impact of the weather goes far beyond Storm Henk, this could have been a good start but, as it stands, it simply doesnât work.â