Forecasters, environment officials and politicians have been strongly criticised over the warnings issued before Storm Bert and the fitness of flood defences to cope with increasingly common extreme weather.
A huge clear-up is under way across swathes of Wales and England, with hundreds of properties flooded and a former Welsh mining town hit by a landslip from a coal tip, leaving buildings deep in sludge and mud.
By Monday evening there will still be more than 100 flood warnings active in Wales and England. A major incident was declared at Billing Aquadrome in Northamptonshire where people were rescued from flooded homes and stranded vehicles.
There was also huge disruption on the rail network in parts of southern England and Wales with lines blocked by flood water, fallen trees and debris. Fire crews rescued 57 children from a school bus after it became stuck in flood water in Worcestershire.
The Met Office was criticised for issuing only a yellow warning as Storm Bert swept in across western and southern Britain over the weekend rather than amber or red.
A Met Office spokesperson said a âfull assessmentâ of its warnings would take place but insisted: âStorm Bert was well forecast, 48 hours in advance, with a number of warnings in place ahead of the system reaching the UK.
âWe work closely with partners to assess the potential risks of extreme weather, and the warnings covering Wales highlighted the potential for homes and businesses to flood with fast-flowing or deep flood water possible, causing a danger to life.â
In one of the worst-hit areas, Rhondda Cynon Taf in south Wales, where up to 300 properties were flooded, Natural Resources Wales (NRW) was criticised for not issuing warnings in time. A spokesperson conceded that some people appeared to have received warnings only minutes before homes were flooded.
NRW, which previously warned that the amount of investment in flood defences needed to be tripled, said there was âno silver bulletâ for managing the flood risk in the area.
Sally Davies, a duty tactical manager at NRW, said a âvery intense, localised area of rainâ up to 160mm fell in the area on Sunday, and that the River Taff rose 300mm every 15 minutes at the height of the rainfall.
âBut there is no silver bullet,â she said. âAs a steep and fast-responding catchment, with much of the floodplain already built upon, reducing the flood risk is not at all straightforward.â
John Morgan, the manager of the Rheola pub in Porth, close to Pontypridd, blamed NRW for not doing more. He said: âThis is the third time in four years that we have been flooded. Years ago, this river used to be dredged every year. Now itâs not dredged at all, it all builds up under the bridge. What good are warnings at three oâclock in the morning? What needs to be done is the defences, dredge the rivers, build walls.â
Dozens of people in Cwmtillery, south Wales, were forced from their homes as mud and water came up to their windows. Blaenau Gwent borough council confirmed the landslip was a âwashout of a former coal tip in the areaâ.
One resident, Rob Scholes, said: âMy neighbour phoned and said: âDonât open your front door,â so I didnât and we just watched it come up. I really donât think weâre going to get this cleared up by Christmas.â
The only severe flood warning in England and Wales remained in place at Billing Aquadrome, where a major incident was declared. People waded through water to escape the flooding, holding carrier bags containing belongings.
Huw Irranca-Davies, the Welsh deputy first minister, said there had been record spending on measures to counter flooding but it was simply not possible to protect every single home.
Heledd Fychan, the Plaid Cymru Senedd member for South Wales Central, said not enough had been done since the devastating storms of 2020.
She said: âThis weekendâs events demonstrate that lessons have not been learned, leaving communities at the mercy of the weather without adequate mitigating measures.â
Andrew RT Davies, the leader of the Welsh Conservatives, said: âWe must ask why only a yellow flood warning was issued when the forecast was so dire. And given that these areas, such as Pontypridd, were so badly impacted in 2020, we have to ask why lessons have not been learned.â
The UK environment secretary, Steve Reed, said: âThis government inherited from the previous government flood defences that are in the worst condition on record. Weâve allocated in the budget £2.4bn to upgrade our flood defences, better maintain those we already have, build new flood defences to keep people safe.â
Germany is drawing up a list of bunkers that could provide emergency shelter for civilians, the interior ministry has said, at a time of rising tensions with Russia.
The list would include underground train stations and car parks as well as state buildings and private properties, a ministry spokesperson said.
A digital directory of bunkers and emergency shelters will be drawn up so people can find them quickly using a planned phone app. People would also be encouraged to create protective shelters in their homes by converting basements and garages, the spokesperson told a press briefing.
He declined to give a timetable, saying it was a big project that would take some time, involving the Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance and other authorities.
The country of 84 million people has 579 bunkers, mostly from the second world war and the cold war era, which can provide shelter for 480,000 people, down from about 2,000 bunkers previously.
The spokesperson said the key points of the plan were agreed at a conference of senior officials in June and a special group was looking into it.
Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, concerns have been growing about Moscow’s potential to target other Nato members. In October, German intelligence chiefs warned that Russia would probably be capable of launching an attack on the military alliance by 2030.
German officials say the country is already experiencing a sharp rise in Russian spying and sabotage activities. Last week the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, said the conflict in Ukraine had characteristics of a “global” war and he did not rule out strikes on western countries.
Few manmade substances are as individually ubiquitous and dangerous as PFAS and microplastics and when they join forces there is a synergistic effect that makes them even more toxic and pernicious, new research suggests.
The study’s authors exposed water fleas to mixtures of the toxic substances and found they suffered more severe health effects, including lower birth rates, and developmental problems, such as delayed sexual maturity and stunted growth.
The enhanced toxic effects raise alarm because PFAS and microplastics are researched and regulated in isolation from one one another, but humans are virtually always exposed to both. The research also showed those fleas previously exposed to chemical pollution were less able to withstand the new exposures.
The findings “underscore the critical need to understand the impacts of chemical mixtures on wildlife and human health”, wrote the study’s authors, who are with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom.
PFAS are a class of about 15,000 compounds typically used to make products that resist water, stains and heat. They are called “forever chemicals” because they do not naturally break down and accumulate, and are linked to cancer, kidney disease, liver problems, immune disorders, birth defects and other serious health problems.
Microplastics are tiny bits of plastic that are either intentionally added to products or are shed by plastic goods as they deteriorate. They have been found throughout human bodies, and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Research has linked them to developmental harms, hormone disruption cardiovascular disease and other health issues.
Plastic is often treated with PFAS, so microplastics can contain the chemical.
Researchers compared a group of water fleas that had never been exposed to pollution with another group that had been exposed to pollution in the past. Water fleas have high sensitivity to chemicals so they are frequently used to study ecological toxicity.
Both groups were exposed to bits of PET, a common microplastic, as well as PFOA and PFOS, two of the most common and dangerous PFAS compounds. The mixture reflected conditions common in lakes around the world.
The study’s authors found the mixture to be more toxic than PFAS and microplastics in isolation. They attributed about 40% of the increased toxicity to a synergy among the substances that makes them even more dangerous. The authors theorized the synergy has to do with the interplay in the charges of microplastics and PFAS compounds.
The remainder of the increased toxicity was attributed to simple addition of their toxic effects.
Fleas exposed to the mixture showed a “markedly reduced number of offspring”, the authors said. They were also smaller at maturation and showed delayed sexual growth.
The effects they observed “significantly advance” the understanding of exposure to multiple chemicals and substances, the authors wrote.
“It is imperative to continue investigating the toxicological impacts of these substances on wildlife to inform regulatory and conservation efforts,” they said.
Few people know the sea better than Guillaume Picard. He grew up on a boat moored in the port of Hyères in southern France after his parents left 1960s Paris. His first job was on a sailing boat. Then he spent 30 years in the merchant navy before becoming a commercial captain, ferrying tourists and containers across the Mediterranean for more than two decades.
Now aged 65, his grey hair in a ponytail, it is with no small note of sadness that he says, increasingly, it is the land that calls him. âTo be completely honest, I want to go to sea less and less,â he says. âI go hiking a lot in the mountains with my wife, and weâve found an environment that is much more preserved. The mountains are beautiful wherever you go.â
Picardâs beloved sea is being destroyed, he believes, by something uncomfortably close to home: cruise ships. Fifteen years ago they were a rare sight in Marseille. Now, Franceâs second city is one of Europeâs busiest cruise ports. Last year, 2.5 million passengers stopped off, according to the port authority, a million more than the year before.
Faced with this new reality, Picard has decided to become the seaâs protector, swapping his captainâs whites for the all-black of a non-violent protester. His new crew is a growing group of activists known as Stop Croisières, or Stop Cruises. âAt some point we will have to make a choice for our children, for our grandchildren,â he says. âDo we continue to make bigger and more energy-consuming ships with more and more people on board? Are we really going to be able to continue to live on this Earth like this?â
The group is part of a growing protest movement against the cruise ship industry and overtourism across Europeâs cities more broadly. Throughout August, Extinction Rebellion stopped cruise ships entering ports in the Netherlands, and earlier in the year tourists were targeted with water pistols in Barcelona by campaigners demanding, among other things, the closure of cruise ship terminals.
Some cities are implementing measures to limit the cruise industryâs activity, such as banning the ships from city centres, reducing the number that can visit and introducing a tax on passengers. But in Marseille the situation seems harder to change.
Two years ago, the cityâs mayor, socialist Benoît Payan, launched a petition calling for limits on the number of cruise ships allowed to arrive during times of peak pollution, declaring: âMarseille is suffocating.â It attracted more than 50,000 signatures, but little further action. Instead, plans are going ahead for a new cruise terminal to open in 2026 in the Port of Marseille, which is controlled by President Macronâs government in Paris.
Stop Croisières first attracted attention in 2020 when its members â the core of whom now number between 50 and 100, says Picard, including paramedics, lawyers and ecologists â unfurled a banner over a bridge in the northern neighbourhood of LâEstaque, saying: âIn Marseille, breathing kills.â The group made the news again in 2022 when it carried out its first kayak stunt, holding up the Wonder of the Seas, then the worldâs largest cruise liner. Then last month the group kayaked out into the mouth of the port of Marseille and delayed three cruise liners for several hours before being arrested. After both the groupâs kayak stunts, its activists were arrested and then released.
Picard, who has two daughters and grandchildren, has become a kind of father figure to the group. âIâm extremely touched by the commitment of all these young people I see at Stop Croisières,â he says. âThey could all be my children, almost. And I find them extremely motivated, well organised, and aware of the world in which we live.â
For Picard, the switch from boat captain to protester has been a long journey of self-education. When he started working on ships he knew they were âmachines that pollute a lotâ, but little more than that, he says. He became increasingly aware of the impact of parking such âbig monstersâ in the middle of a city, and when his first grandchild was born he decided he needed to act. He says some former colleagues now resent him, while others sympathise without daring to speak out. The captain of one of the liners the activists stopped last month was an old colleague who left him a voice message during the protest. âI havenât listened to it,â he says.
He has regrets about his former career as a commercial sailor, but is trying to share his knowledge of the maritime world with as many people as possible in the hope that it can be useful. âI certainly feel guilty,â he says. âItâs guilt for having participated in the destruction of life. But maybe that is the engine that makes me an activist now.â There is also something stronger than guilt driving his actions. âI also have a huge feeling of anger against the shipping companies.â
Despite his disillusionment with the current state of play, he has not lost hope of rediscovering his love of the sea. âFor the moment itâs a bit like itâs on standby, the sea. With Stop Croisières I interact with it in a different way.â
The stink of excrement was the first thing the residents of Sitilpech noticed when the farm opened in 2017. It hung over the colourful one-storey homes and kitchen gardens in the Maya town in Yucatán, and has never left. Next, the trees stopped bearing fruit, their leaves instead covered with black spots. Then, the water from the vast, porous aquifer emerged from the well with a horrible, overwhelming stench.
“Before, we used that water for everything: for cooking, for drinking, for bathing. Now we can’t even give it to animals. Today, we have to give the chickens purified water because otherwise they get diarrhoea,” says one resident. “The radishes grow thin and the coriander often turns yellow. This has always been a quiet town, where life was very good until that farm started,” they say.
Sitilpech lies on the edge of the Ring of Cenotes, a vast network of sinkhole lakes and underground rivers formed by a meteorite impact 66m years ago. The pig mega-farm is just under a kilometre from the first home in the town. It is part of a network of between 500 and 800 facilities that have appeared across Yucatán peninsula in the past 20 years, often nestled in the middle of the internationally important Yucatán moist forest. A mega-farm can hold up to 50,000 pigs, packed tightly together in small pens. The urine and excrement, antibiotics and hormone treatments seep out beneath their corrals, and are then dried in open-air waste lakes in the tropical heat.
For those that live around them, the spread of the pig mega-farms is a human and ecological disaster. Some Maya villages in Yucatán are outnumbered by pigs 100 to one. In the rainy season, the farms pump out the pig waste through sprinkler systems; it oozes into the porous limestone watershed which connects the Ring of Cenotes. Local people say that those who drink the tap water fall sick, and there are severe consequences for the area’s biodiversity.
“More than 90% of the 800 pig factories estimated to exist in Yucatán operate without any type of environmental permit,” claims Lourdes Medina Carrillo, an environmental lawyer. “These are projects without a record of prior Indigenous consultation, arising from the destruction of forests considered the second most important on the continent, without permits for changes in land use, and with impacts such as water contamination,” she claims.
For many residents, the anger is directed at the Mexican pork brand Kekén, the country’s largest pork exporter. Animals supplied to the brand are sold all over the world, feeding markets in South Korea, Japan and the US. Kekén is part of the Kuo Group conglomerate, which includes companies in the automotive and chemical industry. It generated revenue of more than $1.9bn (£1.5bn) last year, with half coming from the pork division.
The push into this region of Mexico started with the Nafta free trade agreement but accelerated in the early 2000s after the US health authorities declared Yucatán a zone free of classical swine fever. Export restrictions on pork were removed, and companies quickly moved to take advantage.
As the impact of the mega-farms has grown, residents in Sitilpech have resisted them, forming protests in 2023 against the facilities. But in February 2023, they say they were violently repressed by police who stormed a protest camp, beating those present. Other Maya communities have launched legal disputes against Kekén. At least one of those was upheld by the supreme court, after residents of Homún brought a case detailing “grave and irreversible harm to human health and the environment” caused by a 48,000-pig farm, including “contamination of water … emission of noxious air pollution; the spread of dangerous pathogens”.
“When the company came to settle, we saw how it sadly began to cut down the trees that we take care of so much for beekeeping. They left large areas of devastated land,” allege members of a family from Kinchil, an hour from Yucatán’s capital Mérida. “It was very sad. They cut down trees that were more than 100 years old, which are the ones that benefit us the most when there is drought,” they claim.
At the beginning of last year, the federal Mexican environment ministry found that the watershed around farms in Yucatán was saturated with concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus from the pigs’ excrement.
Analysis of water sample from cenotes, springs and wells in Yucatán by scientists, the communities themselves and the Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risks (Cofepris) has found contamination by E coli and other bacteria. Communities reported an increase in cases of intestinal infections in Yucatán between 2012 and 2019, a period of pig farm expansion.
In response, a spokesperson for Kekén says it specialises in pork production of the highest quality and is one of the biggest employers in the Yucatán region. The company says it uses biodigesters to ensure the most efficient water uses, adding that 90% of its facilities are in protected areas for the conservation of biodiversity. They said they provided a range of benefits for local people, including supporting farming in nearby Maya communities.
“The medications, the hormones they give to the pigs, in addition to their excrement, end up in the water. And that water that the industry uses then travels inside the caves, the caverns, the wells through the Ring of Cenotes. This is the common water that nature and communities use for their supply. This pollution breaks all ecological balances, impacts native fauna and flora, causes loss of biodiversity and even an excess of organic matter,” says Medina Carrillo.
“This is an extremely serious problem because the aquifer of the peninsula, the wells and cenotes, are interconnected,” she says.
Mexico’s new president, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, said during her campaign that she would not promote the closure of mega-farms in Yucatán. “I understand that there are regulations for pig farms, there is technology to avoid contamination … the issue is that the regulations are complied with,” she declared in a press conference in March. “This idea that mega-farms must be closed because they pollute, no. There is technology.”
An increase in fire ant infestations along Queensland’s Logan River is raising concerns Australia’s worst invasive species could form floating rafts and spread downstream.
The Invasive Species Council advocacy manager, Reece Pianta, said governments should urgently ramp up eradication efforts along the Logan River, in south-east Queensland.
Pianta said the colonies posed a “very high risk” of further spread.
“These fire ants along the Logan river are growing in density and becoming a problem, because they can get into turf, soil and hay, and move to other areas,” he said.
“They can spread in flood events, to land on and reinfest properties where the fire ant colonies had previously been destroyed.”
The invasive insects can float on flood waters by forming large balls or floating rafts. The fire ants can lock their legs together and form air pockets to protect the queen and her eggs.
Once they arrived on dry land, they can reform their colonies in new locations, Pianta said.
“In Queensland, we’ve just come off a couple of weeks of fairly solid rain, and we’re starting to see our first evidence of fire ants rafting,” he said.
“Our concern is that suppression doesn’t seem to be working because the fire ant infestation numbers are growing in that zone,” Pianta said. “More resources are clearly needed, more community engagement and probably some federal government funding support.”
Fire ant incursions into New South Wales have occurred since late 2023. In November this year, the NSW government placed a temporary suspension on turf movements from heavily infested areas of south-east Queensland, after the pests were found in turf delivered to Clunes, near Byron Bay.
“Fire ants won’t march into NSW; they will either be carried with materials such as soil, mulch, hay and turf, or fly in by natural spread from Queensland. Which is why we’re ramping up surveillance in these high-risk areas,” the NSW agriculture minister, Tara Moriarty, said at the time.
First detected in Queensland in 2001, fire ants were considered one of the worst invasive species to reach Australia, according to the federal government. They damaged agriculture and wildlife, inflicted painful stings on people and animals, and restricted everyday outdoor activities like picnics and sporting events.
In previous years, the ants have used flooding in Queensland to spread into new areas, as rafts are deposited by rivers or flood waters.
Foreign multinational companies are extracting billions of litres of water from British aquifers to sell as bottled water, the Guardian can reveal.
Coca-Cola extracts the largest amount of freshwater of any drinks company in England, the data obtained through freedom of information legislation shows. It has a licence to extract 1.59bn litres of water a year from boreholes in Sidcup, Kent for its soft drinks. On top of that, it has the right to take 377m litres for its bottled water brands Glaceau Smartwater and Abbey Well from Morpeth in Northumberland.
The French company Sources Alma is one of the biggest players in the UK water market, supplying bottled water to Tesco and Asda as well as producing its own Aqua Pura brand. Through its British subsidiary Roxane, it has the right to extract 1.5bn litres annually from Armathwaite in Cumbria, where it bottles Tesco’s Ashbeck water. It also bottles large quantities of water in Staffordshire, where it produces Tesco’s Elmhurst brand, but this spring water is supplied by a third company – South Staffordshire Water plc – so the quantities are not publicly available.
The Swiss giant Nestlé Waters has the right to extract a total of 880m litres of water for its brands Buxton and Pure Life from its sites in Derbyshire and Pembrokeshire, where it took over the Welsh company Princes Gate in 2018.
Also in Derbyshire is Germany’s Schwarz, which bottles water for Lidl, with a licence to pump up 700m litres a year. Meanwhile, the French company Danone has bought Harrogate Spring Water, where it can extract 460m litres a year.
In Scotland, Highland Spring is dominant. Its licence allows it to take 1.85bn litres a year from the Speyside Glenlivet crown estate in the Scottish Highlands. Highland Spring is owned by Mahdi Al Tajir, a Bahrain-born billionaire businessman and Scotland’s richest man. Highland Spring said that it only extracted 32% of the amount allowed by its licence and that it had detected “no discernible impact on the rivers and groundwater levels due to abstraction”.
The UK trade body, the Natural Source Water Association, says bottled water represents a tiny fraction of all water abstracted in Britain: in England it is 0.05%, Scotland 0.2% and Wales 0.08%. “For natural source water companies, thewater they abstract is the precious commodity at the centre of their operations so they are very careful how they use it,” it said in a statement.
However, the UN special rapporteur for water, Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, said that, although the bottling industry used relatively small amounts of water compared with other industries such as intensive agriculture or mining, “the issue is that bottled water companies are taking the best quality drinking water”.
As reported in the Guardian, during droughts in Spain and Latin America, populations have run out of drinking water and have had to buy bottled water from foreign companies who have extracted it from their own national territory. In times of shortage, if governments prioritise giving concessions to private bottling companies, Arrojo-Agudo says, “this can put at risk the availability of this higher quality water for public supply”.
During the UK’s hot summer of 2022, farmers in Ludchurch, Wales, complained that they faced water restrictions while Nestlé continued to extract millions of litres of local water.
Nestlé Waters said: “Nestlé is a founding member of the Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS). Our bottling site in Buxton was the first site in the UK to achieve a platinum certification – the highest level available. The Princes Gate site in Pembrokeshire is set to undergo the AWS audit in 2025.”
The bottled water market is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few multinationals, which have bought up many local brands. Five companies account for 83% of bottled water sales in the UK, according to the consultants Zenith Global. Roxane (owned by Sources Alma) has a 38% market share, Nestlé 14%, Highland Spring 12% and Danone 10%. The fifth – the British-owned company Shepley Spring – has a 9% share of the UK market. Operating through a third company, it has the right to extract almost 600m litres a year in Yorkshire, where it bottles water for Morrisons, Booker, Iceland and Amazon, as well as its own brands Ice Valley and White Rock.
In Britain, there are three types of bottled water. Products sold as “natural mineral water” and “spring water” must come from an underground natural source and be bottled at that source. Unlike mineral water, spring water does not need a guaranteed mineral composition and may be treated to remove or add substances. Products sold as “bottled water” can come from a variety of sources, including tap water. The figures in this article do not include water taken from the municipal public water system, that is to say tap water.
Worldwide, Coca-Cola sells more bottled water than any other company, according to Euromonitor International. Nestlé’s Pure Life is the biggest-selling single brand.
The Environment Agency said: “Water bottling licences come with strict conditions to ensure the environment is protected. Where there is risk of damage to the environment, we have the power to amend or revoke existing licences. These licences currently represent less than 1% of total abstraction licences.”
A little-known, far-right populist took the lead in Romania’s presidential election on Sunday, electoral data showed, and will probably face leftist prime minister Marcel Ciolacu in a runoff in two weeks, an outcome that has rocked the country’s political landscape.
Calin Georgescu, who ran independently, led the polls with about 22% of the vote after nearly 93% of votes were counted, while Ciolacu of the Social Democratic party, or PSD, trailed at 21%. Elena Lasconi of the Save Romania Union party, or USR, stood at about 18%, and George Simion, the leader of the far-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians, or AUR, took about 14%.
After polls closed, 9.4 million people – about 52.4% of eligible voters – had cast ballots, according to the Central Election Bureau. The second round of the vote will be held on 8 December.
The president serves a five-year term and has significant decision-making powers in areas such as national security, foreign policy and judicial appointments in the European Union and Nato member country.
Georgescu, 62, ran independently and was not widely known. He outperformed most local surveys, sending shock waves through Romania’s political establishment as he ascended to pole position.
After casting his ballot on Sunday, Georgescu said in a post on Facebook that he voted “For the unjust, for the humiliated, for those who feel they do not matter and actually matter the most … the vote is a prayer for the nation.”
Cristian Andrei, a political consultant based in Bucharest, told The Associated Press that Georgescu’s unexpected poll performance appears to be a “large protest or revolt against the establishment.”
“The mainstream political parties have lost the connection with regular Romanians,” he said. “You don’t have strong candidates or strong leaders … there are weak candidates, weak leaders, and the parties in general are pretty much disconnected.
Georgescu lacks an agenda, Andrei said, and has a vague and populist manifesto with positions that are “beyond the normal discourse.” His stances include supporting Romanian farmers, reducing dependency on imports, and ramping up energy and food production.
Georgescu has called Nato’s ballistic missile defense shield in the Romanian town of Deveselu a “shame of diplomacy”. He has said the North Atlantic alliance will not protect any of its members should they be attacked by Russia.
According to his website, Georgescu holds a doctorate in pedology, a branch of soil science, and held different positions in Romania‘s environment ministry in the 1990s. Between 1999 and 2012, he was a representative for Romania on the national committee of the United Nations Environment Program.
Videos posted to his popular TikTok account, where he has amassed 1.6 million likes, depict him attending church, doing judo, running around an oval track, and speaking on podcasts.
Romania shares a 650-km (400-mile) border with Ukraine and since Russia attacked Kyiv in 2022, it has enabled the export of millions of tons of grain through its Black Sea port of Constanta and provided military aid, including the donation of a Patriot air defence battery.
Villages on the border with Ukraine have seen a barrage of drones breaching national airspace although no casualties have been reported.
One political commentator said Russian meddling to give Georgescu an edge could not be ruled out in the election.
“Based on Georgescu’s stance towards Ukraine and the discrepancy between opinion surveys and the actual result, we cannot rule (that) out,” said Sergiu Miscoiu, a political science professor at Babes-Bolyai University.
Ecaterina Nawadia, a 20-year-old architecture student, said she voted for the first time in a national election on Sunday and hoped young people turn out in high numbers.
“Since the (1989) revolution, we didn’t have a really good president,” she said. “I hope most of the people my age went to vote … because the leading candidate is not the best option.”
Romania will also hold parliamentary elections on 1 December that will determine the country’s next government and prime minister.
Andrei, the political consultant, said Romania’s large budget deficit, high inflation, and an economic slowdown could push more mainstream candidates to shift toward populist stances amid widespread dissatisfaction.
Ciolacu told the AP before the first-round vote that one of his biggest goals was “to convince Romanians that it is worth staying at home or returning” to Romania, which has a massive diaspora spread throughout EU countries.
20th over: Australia 59-4 (Smith 16, Head 27) Washington round the wicket to Head, too short, cut for a couple in that muscular, heaving Head fashion, heaving at the shot so it goes through cover rather than backward point. Now then, perfect sweep shot! Powerfully struck, along the ground, out through backward square. Fourrrr. Then goes back and cuts behind point for one. Heâs liking the non-spinning spin, and he does like making runs against India.
19th over: Australia 52-4 (Smith 16, Head 20) Ric Finlay on the ABC doing the stats on Smithâs last 18 months in terms of modes of dismissal: leg before wicket is substantially up, but bowled is down, and the combination is about even. Read into that what you will. Rana is still targeting the pads, but not every ball, and Smith in between defensive efforts manages to drive two through cover point.
18th over: Australia 50-4 (Smith 14, Head 20) Washington after drinks, uneventful again. A single and a leg bye to raise the Australian 50. Small wins.
âHope you have remote access to enable the Snooze button on Rob Smythâs alarm, he can likely sleep in today,â writes James Cahill. Well, Smith and Head are threatening to make him wake up in the cold early northern hemisphere morning.
17th over: Australia 48-4 (Smith 13, Head 20) India lose a review! Smith is smashed on the pad again, angling in at the stumps. Rana is turned down, and the review is missing the umpireâs call designation by a whisker, green light on impact. So a review down, but itâs another missed flick from Smith, who commits himself to keeping out the next few balls, then does connect with a flick through wide mid on for a run. Head takes another easily to square leg.
Andrew Benton writes in. âIâm sure this test is just a blip for Australia, theyâll be back. No team with a series against Australia in the next year or two should be feeling smug, in fact they should be watching warily for the response next test. But India are just amazing.â
Drinks.
16th over: Australia 46-4 (Smith 12, Head 19) Spin time, Washington Sundar with his offies. Pretty quick, pretty flat, pretty innocuous first over.
15th over: Australia 45-4 (Smith 11, Head 19) Scorched through cover again by Head! The last one was on the bounce, that one might have been airborne, but it has the pace and the direction to again reach the fence. Rana follows up with a beauty that beats the outside edge. This is fun cricket.
Paul Moody writes in. Any relation to Long Tom, whoâs on ABC radio this week? âGosh this is so exciting. Imagine if Oz were 6 or 7 down at the end of play today. Iâm following by your words, but will go to Southern Cross in Kampot to watch a bit too.â
Iâve deduced that this means a bar in Cambodia. Have a cold Angkor for me.
14th over: Australia 38-4 (Smith 10, Head 13) Bumrah is back. That was quick. Replacing Siraj, changing ends from the end where he took those wickets last night. And Head drives him through the covers! Into the ground and bouncing away past Washington the fielder, but smashed hard enough that this one does, finally, make the boundary. The first of the innings!
Narshan emails in. âAnyone ever seen a slower outfield in Australia? More grass than in Pattaya!â
Youâre right, I canât recall one slower.
Bumrah bowls a no-ball with his sixth, and has to re-deliver it. No run.
13th over: Australia 33-4 (Smith 10, Head 9) Runs still coming, Head drives one, Smith glides a couple using Ranaâs pace. Then a shot that might make Smith feel better, his old faithful flick through the leg side, timed nicely and speeding away for two runs. Thatâs the shot that has been deserting him the last few years as heâs been lbw more and more often.
No comfort from the following ball though, short and into his stomach! Smashes into the solar plexus. Thatâs hurt Smith. Heâs down on the ground, rocking on his back, taking a minute to catch his breath. Badly winded. Thatâs uncomfortable, but he gets back to his feet eventually to see out the over.
12th over: Australia 28-4 (Smith 6, Head 8) Four for Head, but all run! He thrashes Siraj square, everyone expects it to reach the rope, but the slow outfield here sees it pull up short. That gives the batters time to get back. Next ball, nearly gets him, around the wicket angling in, Head thrashes at it, big inside edge into his knee, almost back onto the stumps. Siraj is rolling around on the ground in frustration.
Following that, heâs so pumped up that he demands, insists on an lbw dismissal when he crashes into Headâs pad next ball. The ball looks like itâs heading past the leg stump. Siraj though is heading for the slip cordon. He just takes off in a celebrappeal, ignores the umpire entirely and is throwing high fives with his fielders.
Meanwhile, Head is standing there looking bemused, as is the umpire. Not out. India have to review after that malarkey, and they think the ball has straightened, which it has but not enough. Umpireâs call, possibly grazing the leg stump.
Head gets off strike cutting a single.
11th over: Australia 23-4 (Smith 6, Head 3) Bumrah is off. Surprisingly early, but heâs captain, and he asks Harshit Rana to come on and fire it down. He does, fires it down the leg side in terms of angle, though Smithâs pad gets in the way. The appeal is turned down. No run from the over.
10th over: Australia 23-4 (Smith 6, Head 3) This is top bowling from Siraj. Gets a ball to cut back in, Smith has to jab at it to keep it out. Then one holding the line, past the outside edge. Smith is happy to pull, taking a single.
9th over: Australia 22-4 (Smith 5, Head 3) Smith goes off to side against Bumrah here, dropping a run towards cover, before Head clips two through square leg. Odd that the runs are coming from Bumrah, and not the other end. Good from Australia to look to score against him though, carefully, rather than panicking and treating him like heâs impossible to face. Bumrah is around the wicket to Head, in at the stumps and the pads, with a short midwicket in place. He wants Head to fall over to the off side, flicking a catch there.
8th over: Australia 19-4 (Smith 4, Head 1) A maiden for Siraj, bowling to Head, who is playing just about everything to the leg side, hopping about a bit just to keep the ball out.
7th over: Australia 19-4 (Smith 4, Head 1) A couple of singles from the Bumrah over, both batters nudging to the leg side, keeping out the threat.
6th over: Australia 17-4 (Smith 3, Head 0) Travis Head to the middle. How does he play it? Australia with counter-attackers at 5 and 6, having just lost their premier long-innings merchant for a very short innings.
WICKET! Khawaja c Pant c Siraj 4, Australia 17-4
Ohh, Usman Khawaja. What is that. Do you need to be taking on the short ball second over of the day, with the new ball that bounces more? He says he does. Pull shot, top edge straight up, and Pant trots back to catch it. Poor, poor dismissal.
5th over: Australia 17-3 (Khawaja 4, Smith 3) Hit on the pad first ball! Bumrah goes up! All the Indians go up! But itâs a no ball. The umpire wasnât into it anyway, too high. Smith survives, then thrives, with a nice cover drive for three. Thatâs confident. Khawaja tucks a run around the corner, moving across to the off side. Runs from Bumrah? Huh.
Here we goâ¦
Interesting little bit from Alex Carey on SEN radio this morning, saying that the main thing the remaining batters had to do was look at this as an opportunity to make runs rather than worrying about the result. Have as long a session in the middle as possible for the sake of their own games, knowing that can be beneficial for the remaining matches. Seems sensible, even if itâs not the flag-waving, save-the-day talk that some would favour.
So it will be Usman Khawaja to resume in quarter of an hour or so, having scored 3 from 9 balls, along with Steve Smith who will be on a king pair. Got out first ball in the first innings.
After that, Head, Marsh, Carey, and three of the four bowlers, with Cummins already done.
Thereâs always so much attention on Virat Kohli. It feels as though Australian cricket is almost as obsessed with him as Indian cricket.
Well, hereâs yesterdayâs century report, with a fair bit of Yashasvi Jaiswal too.
Preamble
Geoff Lemon
Good morning from Perth, good day or afternoon or evening or witching hours wherever else in the world you may be. Itâs sunny, itâs wildly windy, and itâs not going to get too hot today, and India will be bowling for victory with everything stacked on their side.
Hereâs the equation. Australia are 522 runs behind. Three wickets down. And they have two full days to try to survive on a wicket that has already started demonstrating the erratic bounce associated with this Perth Stadium pitch on days four and five.
Buckleyâs and none.
Yes, that margin was 522, five hundred and twenty two. Thatâs after Jaiswal and Kohli made centuries yesterday while some teammates batted and then clattered around them.
Australia, done in, then lost three wickets by stumps: first the makeshift opener McSweeney, then the captain Cummins trying to protect his first drop Labuschagne, then Labuschagne himself.
Things have gone very badly indeed in that Australian side since they bowled out India for 150 on day one. India, meanwhile, can go into a five-Test series one-up, unless something truly bizarre happens.
Whatâs in it for Australia? Try to get some good time in the middle against Indiaâs bowlers, figure out a method against Bumrah, make the opposition toil and hurt for their win.
Thatâs about it. The recriminations will come later, but they may be tempered or intensified by the manner in which today plays out.
Well, something to work on there then, Ruben. It would be tempting at the end of this decelerating game of semi-football to talk about Ruben Amorim at least realising the scale of the job he faces.
Except, given Amorim almost certainly possesses a TV set and is interested in football, he already knows the scale of the job. And the scale is: really very big indeed.
Itâs not the scale though. Itâs the tone, the texture, the deathly spirit of this United team that really needs to be digested in the flesh, the sheer joyless incoherence, a Manchester United team that is all trapped energy and broken patterns, the football equivalent of a chipped gravy boat handed down unhappily through the generations.
It was there in the hilariously ambling patterns of Joshua Zirkzee, who just seems always to be floating around quite close to the spectacle, like a man listening to a podcast while strolling on the local rec, tactfully avoiding the dogwalkers.
It was there in a fascinating interlude on 24 minutes as United ferried the ball around sleepily, the backline completely failing to intersect with the midfield in front of it, no angles, no pockets to shift past the press. Watching this, Amorim looked calm, poker faced, right up to the moment you looked at his feet and he seemed to be trying to stand on tip toes, doing some kind of secretive hyper-clenched thigh workout, swallowing it down. He spread his arms wide as another pass shuttled across the face of the penalty area, possession without hunger or drive or purpose, football happening in a vacuum.
With this in mind, for Unitedâs fans the most heartening aspect of this deathly 1-1 draw with Ipswich is that Amorim very clearly gets this. âWe are going to suffer for a long period,â he shrugged, smiling just a little bit wearily in his post-match press conference at Portman Road. The job is huge, overwhelming, perhaps even insoluble. The first positive step is knowing all these things for certain. And Amorimâs players did him a favour in that respect here. He is, if nothing else, utterly free from any kind of illusions.
From the start there was something lovely and windswept and vaguely Jane Austen about travelling through the Suffolk countryside to meet a handsome man with brooding eyes who has been charged with reviving a grand old ailing estate.
The three-week hiatus between appointment and full match-day rein-taking had given this occasion a sense of delayed intrigue, nine days of intense tactical edging about wing-backs and centre-half partnerships.
There was a slight sense of double take about Amorimâs starting XI . OK. So, weâre going new energy, freshness, unforgiving demands on press and movement and structure. Weâre going â it says here – with Casemiro, Christian Eriksen and Jonny Evans.
But it only took 82 seconds for everything to be all right, with a goal that came entirely from the Amorim rejig. Amad Diallo at right wing-back? Yep. We can do that too. Here he took the ball close to halfway and went straight into a full, ravenous, high rev sprint. The low cross with his newly empowered right foot was perfectly measured. Marcus Rashford just had to walk the ball into the net.
Amorimâs reaction was perfect, in that there was no reaction, just a swivel back towards the bench, a flicker perhaps in the eyes. Rashford seemed out of sorts in those early moments. That is, he seemed hungry, energised and furiously mobile. He sprinted after lost passes, fouled and harried.
And for a while, as United had their best spell, there was a chance to linger on that vital quality, the Amorim touchline energy. There was an aura from the start, striding out in heavy-tog quilted coat, white trainers, skinny tailored slacks, off-the-peg Euro football royalty uniform. The package is good.
Jawline, hair, the controlled energy in his movements.
The United away support, which is always noisy, got to roll around and bounce and sing about the 12 Cantonas of Christmas. It didnât last. Ipswich pressed back with real purpose, a process that is always easier when you find no resistance, a gap, a space to press into.
Unitedâs midfield structure was odd, porous, leaving pathways that Ipswich began to trace, moving in neat triangles between the static parts. The equaliser was always coming, and it was fitting Omari Hutchison should score it after a sublime, high-craft first half.
Amorim didnât sit down through all of this. He didnât scream and shout and point. Instead he paced, hands bunched in his pockets, in an ever shrinking arc from left to right. Somebody needs to take a cleaver to this thing. Amorim may have a kind of Left Bank soulfulness about him, soft deep brown eyes, the perfectly cropped bristles. But he is also clear-eyed and ruthless. And yes, he really is going to need all of that.