1. Michael Cohenâs testimony concluded
Cohen, who took the stand on Monday, 13 May and was the prosecutionâs most important witness, saw his cross-examination, and re-direct, end this afternoon. Indeed, prosecutors said that Trump, Cohen and tabloid honcho David Pecker plotted in summer 2015 to keep negative press about the then-candidate under wraps â so as not to derail his presidential campaign.
During his direct testimony, Cohen told jurors that Trump instructed him to fix Stormy Danielsâ account of an extramarital liaison in 2006 and personally signed checks that reimbursed him for the $130,000 hush-money payment.
Trumpâs lead attorney, Todd Blanche, struggled to hit Cohen with âgotchaâ moments, and the closest he arguably came was in offering an alternative explanation about why the ex-presidentâs longtime confidant would receive $420,000 in payments for a $130,000 cost.
Cohen received a $150,000 bonus in 2015, but a $50,000 bonus in 2016. Blanche suggested that Cohen used the repayment setup to get his hands on bonus money he thought he deserved. Cohen paid a tech company called Red Finch $20,000 to help make Trump look better in a poll about business leaders , and told then Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg that he was owed $50,000. In Blancheâs understanding, this meant that Cohen stole $30,000 from Trumpâs namesake company.
âSo you stole from the Trump Organization?â Blanche asked. âYes, sirâ, Cohen said.
2. Cohen regained his footing on re-direct
After cross wrapped, prosecutor Susan Hoffinger had an opportunity to question Cohen again. She tried to undermine Blancheâs suggestion that Cohenâs cooperation against Trump was out of self-interest. She asked what had happened to him since he started speaking out and, ultimately, cooperating with law enforcement.
âMy entire life has been turned upside down as a direct result, I lost my law license, my businesses, my financial security,â Cohen said.
Hoffinger also tried to undercut Blancheâs suggestion that Cohen was very distracted in October 2016, dealing with a litany of issues, such that he might not really recall how often he spoke with Trump about Daniels.
Hoffinger asked: âApproximately how many conversations would you say that you had with Mr Trump about the Stormy Daniels matter just in October of 2016, if you can approximate?â âMore than 20â, Michael Cohen said.
âWould you have paid Stormy Daniels if Mr Trump had not signed off?â Hoffinger pressed. He said: âNo maâamâ, and, when asked why not, he explained: âBecause, I wanted to ensure that Iâd get my funds back.â
3. Robert Costello claimed Cohen cleared Trump in conversations
Costello was a defense lawyer with whom Cohen met after federal authorities raided his hotel room and apartment. Cohen told jurors that he was leery of Costello, who had described a close relationship with Trump ally Rudy Giuliani. Cohen said he didnât trust Costello, concerned that anything he said would get to Giuliani and thus, Trump.
âDo you know somebody named Michael Cohen?â he was asked. Costello said he met Cohen on 17 April 2018, at the hotel where he was staying. âHe was absolutely manic at the beginning and throughout the two hours of that meeting, he kept on pacing back and forth, left and right,â Costello said.
âI explained to Michael Cohen that this entire legal problem he was facing would be resolved by the end of the week if he had truthful information about Donald Trump and cooperated with the southern district of New York,â Costello told jurors. Cohen allegedly claimed: âI swear to god, Bob, I donât have anything on Donald Trump.
4. Costello prompted near-chaos in court
Despite Costelloâs comments on Cohen, he wasnât exactly a great witness for the defense because of his courtroom composure. He said âjeezâ at one point and instructed that something be stricken â which is something only a judge can do.
Judge Juan Merchan directed the jury to leave at one point during his testimony and then told Costello: âSo when thereâs a witness on the stand and you donât like my ruling, you donât say âjeez,â and you donât say âstrike itâ. Because Iâm the only one who can strike … â Merchan said.
It devolved further.
âYou donât roll your eyes, do you understand that? Do you understand that? Are you staring me down right now?â Merchan said. Then, the judge ordered âclear the courtroom,â kicking the press and public out of court proceedings, for which there is a presumption of access under the US constitution, New York state and common law.
He did not allow a media attorney to address the court regarding the access issue. So Merchan booted reporters from the courtroom; they were let back in several moments later.