Cop29 live: talks into overtime as Greta Thunberg says people in power âabout to agree to death sentenceâ | Cop29
Greta Thunberg: People in power ‘about to agree to a death sentence’

Damian Carrington
The worldâs most famous climate campaigner, Greta Thunberg, does not attend Cops these days, and her post on X about Cop29 shows why. She says Cop29 is failing and it âup to us as a global collective to take the action we so desperately needâ.
As the COP29 climate meeting is reaching its end, it should not come as a surprise that yet another COP is failing. The current draft is a complete disaster. But even if our expectations are close to non-existent, we must never ever find ourselves reacting to these continuous betrayals with anything but rage.
The people in power are yet again about to agree to a death sentence to the countless people whose lives have been or will be ruined by the climate crisis. The current text is full of false solutions and empty promises. The money from the Global North countries needed to pay back their climate debt is still nowhere to be seen.
Those in power are worsening the destabilisation and destruction of our life supporting ecosystems. We are on track to experience the hottest year ever recorded, with the global greenhouse gases reaching an all time high just last year.
The COP processes arenât just failing us, they are part of a larger system built on injustice and designed to sacrifice current and future generations for the opportunity of a few to keep making unimaginable profits and continue to exploit planet and people.
With every negotiation, with every speech made by a world leader and with every agreement they sign, it becomes clear that it is up to us as a global collective to take the action we so desperately need and show where the leadership truly lies. They are not going to do it for us, as this COP29 yet again proves.
Key events
Marching in silence with their arms crossed high, activists from around the world protested the draft deal at the Cop29 venue last night.
âPay up or shut up!â the campaign group Demand Climate Justice said in a post on social media.
Safaâ Al Jayoussi from Oxfam described it as a âshameful failure of leadershipâ.
âThe Cop29 Presidencyâs top-down âtake-it-or-leave-itâ approach has sidelined progressive voices,â she said.
Activists hold a silent protest against a draft agreement. Photograph: Murad Sezer/Reuters
Poor countries reacted with anger to a draft $250bn climate finance target on Friday, dismissing it as a âjokeâ. It prompted a diplomatic effort behind the scenes to increase the offer from rich countries. The Guardian understands they agreed to bump the offer to $300bn.
The new figure would still fall well short of what is being demanded by poor countries, who have done little to change the climate but suffer the brunt of violent weather.
Dharna Noor
As negotiators hash out a final deal at Cop29, Palestinian officials and activists are reminding attendees about another crisis: Israelâs siege of Gaza.
âThe Cop [meetings] are very keen to protect the environment, but for whom?â said Ahmed Abu Thaher, director of projects and international relations at Palestineâs Environment Quality Authority, who had travelled to Cop29 from Ramallah. âIf you are killing the people there, for whom are you keen to protect the environment and to minimise the effects of climate change?â
Activists are calling the war on Gaza an âecocideâ and demanding countries stop sending fuel to Israel.
For more, check out my story from this morning.
Rich countries agree to stump up more cash – sources
Negotiators have told our reporters on-the-ground that rich countries have agreed to up their offer on the crucial issue of climate finance. Read the full story from Adam Morton, Fiona Harvey and the rest of the team here.
Major rich countries at UN climate talks in Azerbaijan have agreed to lift a global financial offer to help developing nations tackle the climate crisis to $300bn a year, as ministers met through the night in a bid to salvage a deal.
The Guardian understands the Azeri hosts brokered a lengthy closed-door meeting with a small group of ministers and delegation heads, including China, the EU, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, the UK, US and Australia, on key areas of dispute on climate finance and the transition away from fossil fuels.
It came as the Cop29 summit in Baku, which had been due to finish at 6pm Friday, dragged into Saturday morning. A plenary session had been planned for 10am but did not eventuate.
The developing world reacted with anger to a draft $250bn climate finance target on Friday, dismissing it as a âjokeâ and far below the amount that is needed to help the poor shift to a low-carbon economy and adapt to the impacts of extreme weather. It prompted a diplomatic effort behind the scenes to increase the offer from developed nations.
Multiple sources said the EU and several members of the umbrella group of countries including the UK, US and Australia had indicated they could go to $300bn in exchange for other changes to a draft text released on Friday.
The Guardian understands that the UN secretary general, António Guterres, was ringing round capitals to push for a higher figure. Japan, Switzerland and New Zealand were understood to be among the countries resistant to the $300bn figure late on Friday.
A $300bn offer would still fall well short of what developing countries say is necessary, and would likely still draw sharp criticism if included in an updated text expected later on Saturday. But with some ministers booked to leave Baku in the hours ahead, countries face a decision on what they are prepared to accept.
Several ministers from rich nations have argued that a deal may be easier now than next year, when Donald Trump will be US president and right-wing governments could be returned at elections in several countries, including Germany and Canada, and they do not want to make a commitment they cannot meet.
Claudio Angelo, from Observatório do Clima in Brazil, said rich countries had âclearly arrived to ditch their obligationsâ. âAfter three years of negotiations the first time we ever saw quantum in the text was yesterday,â he said.
He said $300bn in grant funding was âway, way belowâ what developing countries needed. âRemember, many of them are already in deep debt,â he said. âTo have climate finance as the current text proposes will only entrap those countries more.â
According to the draft text of a deal circulated on Friday, developing countries would receive at least $1.3tn a year in climate finance by 2035, which is in line with the demands most submitted in advance of this two-week conference.
But poor nations wanted much more of that headline finance to come directly from rich countries, preferably in the form of grants rather than loans. They said the offer of $250bn coming from rich countries, with few safeguards over how much would come without strings attached, was much too little.
The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) went to Moscow to talk to Russia about oil yesterday, as delegates in neighbouring Azerbaijan struggled to bring the climate conference to a close. The dialogue highlighted energy security and âthe risk of underinvestmentâ, according to OPEC.
The group posted a video on social media last night, set to dramatic orchestral strings, with pictures of OPECâs secretary-general Haitham Al Ghais and Russiaâs deputy prime minister Alexander Novak at the 9th meeting of the OPEC-Russia Energy Dialogue. It said the two groups had examined oil market developments across short, medium and long-term horizons, and that âkey topics included the ongoing climate change negotiations at Cop29.â
Russia, which is not a member of the 12-member group but is part of the larger OPEC+ alliance that pumps half the worldâs oil, said it will continue to be a âkey playerâ in the oil market.
Earlier this week, Al Ghais echoed Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyevâs comments in praise of oil and gas.
âThey are indeed a gift of God,â he told the Cop29 summit on Wednesday.

Damian Carrington
Itâs looking like Cop29 may run way over time. The UN climate body which runs the talks with the host nation just told me: âWhile the schedule is subject to change due to ongoing negotiations, the final plenary is expected to begin in the early afternoon between 1pm and 3pm (Baku time).â
They are also planning to have food outlets open after 8pm this evening and into the early hours of Sunday.
The latest finishing Cop was in Madrid in 2019, as this chart from Carbon Brief shows â it finished at 1.55pm on the Sunday. All Cops are meant to end on Friday.
Greta Thunberg: People in power ‘about to agree to a death sentence’

Damian Carrington
The worldâs most famous climate campaigner, Greta Thunberg, does not attend Cops these days, and her post on X about Cop29 shows why. She says Cop29 is failing and it âup to us as a global collective to take the action we so desperately needâ.
As the COP29 climate meeting is reaching its end, it should not come as a surprise that yet another COP is failing. The current draft is a complete disaster. But even if our expectations are close to non-existent, we must never ever find ourselves reacting to these continuous betrayals with anything but rage.
The people in power are yet again about to agree to a death sentence to the countless people whose lives have been or will be ruined by the climate crisis. The current text is full of false solutions and empty promises. The money from the Global North countries needed to pay back their climate debt is still nowhere to be seen.
Those in power are worsening the destabilisation and destruction of our life supporting ecosystems. We are on track to experience the hottest year ever recorded, with the global greenhouse gases reaching an all time high just last year.
The COP processes arenât just failing us, they are part of a larger system built on injustice and designed to sacrifice current and future generations for the opportunity of a few to keep making unimaginable profits and continue to exploit planet and people.
With every negotiation, with every speech made by a world leader and with every agreement they sign, it becomes clear that it is up to us as a global collective to take the action we so desperately need and show where the leadership truly lies. They are not going to do it for us, as this COP29 yet again proves.

Patrick Greenfield
As we wait for signs of movement in the negotiations, the conference centre is a ghost town this morning. Gone are the crowds of delegates and rammed food halls. The organisers are busy dismantling pavilions and the network of tents built around the Olympics stadium here in Baku. Competition for food, water and toilet roll is a growing issue.
This morning, the New York Times ran a story about Singapore beer made from recycled toilet water on offer at Cop29. In a few hours, maybe that will start to seem appealing. Air conditioning units have been turned up to 30C in some areas, literally turning the heat up for negotiators.
Everything about the venue is telling those that remain to get on with it, reach a deal and leave. But at the time of writing, no time for a plenary is listed on the TV screens. We continue to wait.
As we wait for the new text to land itâs worth looking back at the closing summary from yesterday, when the conference should have ended.
Yesterdayâs closing summary:
-
Mary Robinson, the former president of Ireland and twice a UN climate envoy, said rich country budgets were stretched amid inflation, Covid and conflicts including Russiaâs war in Ukraine, and warned that poorer countries might have to compromise.
-
The UK government pledged £239m to tackle deforestation
-
In an unusual intervention, the UAE stepped in and warned that the world must stand behind a historic resolution made last year to âtransition away from fossil fuelsâ as the Saudis tried to block the language.
-
The draft text was published, but met a pretty hostile reception. It called for $1.3tn by 2035.
-
Civil society called it âan absolute embarrassmentâ
-
Few countries have spoken up so far, but their reactions have been mixed. The Australian climate change minister, Chris Bowen, has responded to the latest text from the presidency, describing it as a âgenuine attemptâ. But Amb Ali Mohamed, Kenyaâs Special Envoy for chair of the African Group of Negotiators called it as âtotally unacceptable and inadequate.â
Climate talks enter overtime

Patrick Greenfield
We are into overtime at Cop29 in Baku and we are still waiting for signs of compromise. It could be a very long Saturday in the Azeri capital, where a plenary is currently scheduled to take place at 10am local time.
The developing world reacted with anger to a draft $250bn climate finance target yesterday, dismissing it as a âjokeâ and far below the amount that is needed. Behind the scenes, a diplomatic effort is underway to increase the offering from rich nations to make sure the deal survives.
The Guardian understands that the UN secretary general is ringing round capitals to push for a higher figure. The EU is among those open to $300bn but Japan, Switzerland and New Zealand do not want to raise the offer, it is understood. Letâs see who budges, if anyone.
Among donor countries, there is anxiety about what Donald Trumpâs return to the US presidency will mean for climate finance, and they do not want to overcommit to a figure they cannot deliver. This, combined with the potential of right wing governments in France, Germany, Canada and elsewhere, means that things are in the balance in Baku.
Welcome to the Guardianâs live coverage of the Cop29 climate conference, Iâm Ajit Niranjan. After a fortnight of negotiations, talks overran well past the Friday evening deadline as countries negotiated over what should appear in the agreed text.
The key question is over climate finance: how much money should be provided to poorer countries by wealthier ones, and what form it should take.
We will be bringing you all the latest developments as they happen. You can also get in touch with us at [email protected].
Slovenian girl, 12, saves project aiming to reintroduce cicadas to New Forest | Conservation
When British conservationists flew to Slovenia this summer hoping to catch enough singing cicadas to reintroduce the species to the New Forest, the grasshopper-sized insects proved impossible to locate, flying elusively at great height between trees.
Now a 12-year-old girl has offered to save the Species Recovery Trust’s reintroduction project. Kristina Kenda, the daughter of the Airbnb hosts who accommodated the trust’s director, Dom Price, and conservation officer Holly Stanworth in the summer summer, will put out special nets to hopefully catch enough cicadas to re-establish a British population.
“I’m very pleased to be able to help the project,” Kristina said. “I like nature and wildlife and it was fun helping Dom and Holly look for cicadas when they were here. Cicadas are a part of the summer in Slovenia so it would be nice to help make them a part of the summer in England as well.”
The black and orange New Forest cicada (Cicadetta montana) was the only cicada species found in Britain. In summer, males produce a high-pitched song – inaudible to many ears – to attract females who lay eggs in the trees. When the tiny nymphs hatch, they fall to the forest floor and burrow into the soil, slowly developing underground for six to eight years before emerging as adults.
The species disappeared from the forest from which it takes its common British name in the 1990s and the Species Recovery Trust has begun a £28,000 project funded by Natural England’s species recovery programme to bring it back.
The plan was to collect – with permission – five males and five females from the Idrija Geopark in Slovenia and establish them in a cicada nursery of enclosed plants in pots created by zoo staff at Paultons Park theme park near the New Forest.
Although Price and Stanworth could not catch the adult cicadas, they found hundreds of tiny mud chimneys made by the nymphs as they emerged from the ground close to their Airbnb accommodation.
They realised that if they could erect a net tent over the area before the cicadas emerge next year, they could catch enough to take back to the UK. But they couldn’t risk leaving the nets up over winter, during which they were likely to be damaged, and could not afford an extra trip to Slovenia.
So Kristina, the daughter of their hosts Katarina and Mitja, offered to undertake the job of setting up the nets in the spring and checking they are secure. She also agreed to monitor the area through the winter to spot any signs of activity.
after newsletter promotion
Price said: “We are so grateful to Kristina and the whole family for their enormous support. At this stage, the project might be impossible without that help. If this method works then we can bring back one of the UK’s most special species, our only cicada and an icon of the New Forest that residents and visitors can enjoy for ever.”
The trust team will now fly out in early June when they hope to collect their precious living cargo. The plan is for the collected adult cicadas to lay eggs on plants in pots, with the subsequent nymphs burrowing into the plant-pot soil. The plants and the soil will then be planted at secret locations in the New Forest and monitored, with the hope that enough offspring emerge to restart the wild population.
It will be a six-year wait to see if the tiny nymphs survive underground to become the first new UK generation of New Forest cicadas.
Ukraine war briefing: US expects thousands of North Korean troops to enter Ukraine combat âsoonâ | Ukraine
The US expects thousands of North Korean troops massing in Russia will âsoonâ enter combat against Ukraine, the secretary of defence said on Saturday. About 10,000 North Korean soldiers were believed to be based in the Russian border region of Kursk, Lloyd Austin said, where they were being âintegrated into the Russian formationsâ. âBased upon what theyâve been trained on, the way theyâve been integrated into the Russian formations, I fully expect to see them engaged in combat soon,â the Pentagon chief said. He had ânot seen significant reportingâ of North Korean troops being âactively engaged in combatâ to date, he said.
Vladimir Putin has warned that Russia would carry out more tests of its new Oreshnik missile in combat and had a stock ready for use, a day after firing the experimental, nuclear-capable ballistic missile on the Ukrainian city of Dnipro. The Russian president described the missileâs first use as a successful test and said more would follow. The Kremlin said the strike on a Ukrainian military facility was designed to warn the west that Moscow would respond to moves by the US and the UK to allow Kyiv strike Russia with their missiles.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy urged world leaders to ârespond firmly and decisivelyâ after the Russian missile strike on Thursday. The Ukrainian president said his country was working on developing new types of air defence to counter ânew risksâ following Russiaâs deployment of a new ballistic missile.
Ukraineâs parliament cancelled Fridayâs session, legislators said, citing the risk of a Russian missile attack on the district of Kyiv where government buildings are located. âThe hour of questions to the government has been cancelled,â said Yevgenia Kravchuk, an MP from the ruling party. âThere are signals of an increased risk of attacks on the government district in the coming days.â
Russia sent air defence missiles and other military technology to North Korea in return for the deployment of troops from the North to support its war in Ukraine, intelligence officials in South Korea said. Experts believe North Koreaâs dispatch of troops to fight against Ukraine and weapons from its vast stockpiles have been repaid with Russian oil and advanced military technology, Justin McCurry and Emma Graham-Harrison report.
Moscowâs forces captured the settlement of Novodmytrivka in eastern Ukraineâs Donetsk region, Russiaâs defence ministry claimed on Friday â the latest gain in what the defence minister, Andrei Belousov, described as an accelerated advance. Ukraineâs military made no mention of the village, north of the key town of Kurakhove. But in a late night report, the general staff noted it was among eight villages where Russian forces were engaged in fighting and trying to advance. It said the Kurakhove sector of the 1,000km (600-mile) front was gripped by heavy fighting, with 10 of 35 armed clashes in the sector still raging. The battlefield accounts of neither side could not be verified.
Russia said Ukraine had returned 46 Russian citizens who were taken there after Ukrainian forces seized a chunk of Russiaâs Kursk region in August. âThe painstaking and lengthy negotiations for the return of our fellow countrymen to their homeland have brought results,â Kurskâs regional governor, Alexei Smirnov, said on Telegram on Friday. âThey are receiving all necessary assistance.â There was no immediate comment from Ukraine.
Ukrainian air defences destroyed 64 out of 114 drones launched by Russia during its latest mass airstrike, Kyivâs military said on Friday. It added that another 41 drones had been âlocationally lostâ, most likely as a result of Ukrainian signal jamming.
Ukraine accused Russian forces of executing five Ukrainian prisoners of war during a single incident in eastern Ukraine last month. The prosecutor generalâs office claimed Russian troops shot and killed the five unarmed Ukrainian soldiers after capturing them during an assault on their position on 2 October on the outskirts of Vuhledar town in the countryâs east.
The UK home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said Britain would continue to see âaggressive languageâ from Vladimir Putin after he threatened to strike the UK. Cooper told Sky News there had been an âaggressive, blustering toneâ from the Russian president throughout the conflict and is was âcompletely unacceptableâ. Meanwhile, the UKâs foreign secretary, David Lammy, vowed to continue to âdo everything that is necessaryâ to help Ukraine combat Russia.
Germanyâs foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, said supporting Ukraineâs self-defence was the âbest protectionâ for peace in Europe. Germanyâs chancellor, Olaf Scholz, who held an hour-long call with Putin last week, has resisted calls to support Ukraineâs longer-range strike capabilities against Russia, after the UK and the US approved Ukraineâs use of Storm Shadow missiles and similar American Atacms weapons inside Russia.
A British man has pleaded guilty to an arson attack on a Ukraine-linked business and accepting pay from a foreign intelligence agency. Jake Reeves, 23, admitted aggravated arson in relation to a fire in March at an east London warehouse belonging to a man only referred to in court as Mr X. He pleaded guilty to an offence under the National Security Act 2023 of obtaining a material benefit from a foreign intelligence service.
Trump picks hedge-fund investor Scott Bessent for treasury secretary | Trump administration
Donald Trump nominated Scott Bessent, a longtime hedge-fund investor who taught at Yale University for several years, to be his treasury secretary, a statement from Trump confirmed on Friday. The job is one of the most powerful in Washington, with huge influence over America’s gigantic economy and financial markets.
The move to select Bessent is the latest as the president-elect starts to pull together the administration for his second term in the White House. The process so far has been marked largely by a focus more on personal and political loyalty to Trump than expertise and experience.
In economics, one of the main focuses and controversies of the treasury role will be to deal with Trump’s high-profile and oft-repeated promises to pursue a policy of aggressive new US tariffs in foreign trade – something that is widely feared by many other countries across the globe.
Wall Street had been closely watching who Trump would pick for the treasury role, especially given his plans to remake global trade through tariffs.
Bessent, 62, has advocated for tax reform and deregulation, particularly to spur more bank lending and energy production, as noted in a recent opinion piece he wrote for the Wall Street Journal.
The stock market surge after Trump’s election victory, he wrote, signaled investor “expectations of higher growth, lower volatility and inflation, and a revitalized economy for all Americans”.
Bessent follows other financial luminaries who have taken the job, including the former Goldman Sachs executives Robert Rubin, Hank Paulson and Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s first treasury chief. Janet Yellen, the current secretary and first woman in the job, previously chaired the Federal Reserve and White House council of economic advisers.
As the 79th treasury secretary, Bessent would essentially be the highest-ranking US economic official, responsible for maintaining the plumbing of the world’s largest economy, from collecting taxes and paying the nation’s bills to managing the $28.6tn Treasury debt market and overseeing financial regulation, including handling and preventing market crises.
The treasury boss also runs US financial sanctions policy, oversees the US-led International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and other international financial institutions, and manages national security screenings of foreign investments in the US.
Bessent would face challenges, including safely managing federal deficits that are forecast to grow by nearly $8tn over a decade due to Trump’s plans to extend expiring tax cuts next year and add generous new breaks, including ending taxes on social security income.
Without offsetting revenues, this new debt would add to an unsustainable fiscal trajectory already forecast to balloon US debt by $22tn through 2033.
Managing debt increases this large without market indigestion will be a challenge, though Bessent has argued Trump’s agenda would unleash stronger economic growth that would grow revenue and shore up market confidence.
Bessent would also inherit the role carved out by Yellen to lead the G7 nations to provide tens of billions of dollars in economic support for Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invasion and tighten sanctions on Moscow. But given Trump’s desire to end the war quickly and withdraw US financial support for Ukraine, it is unclear whether he would pursue this.
Another area where Bessent will likely differ from Yellen is her focus on climate change, from her mandate that development banks expand lending for clean energy to incorporating climate risks into financial regulations and managing hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy tax credits.
Trump, a climate-change skeptic, has vowed to increase production of USfossil fuel energy and end the clean-energy subsidies in Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
Reuters contributed to this report
Texas approves new Bible-based curriculum for elementary schools | Texas
The Texas board of education voted 8-7 on Friday to approve a new Bible-based curriculum in elementary schools.
The curriculum, called “Bluebonnet Learning”, could be implemented as soon as August 2025 and affects English and language arts teaching material for kindergarten through fifth grade public school classes.
Teachers will have a choice to opt into the new faith-based learning curriculum, but the state is offering a financial incentive of $60 a student for participating school districts.
Parents, teachers and rights groups expressed outrage at the move that some say violates the US constitution and will alienate students and teachers of other faiths.
“The Bluebonnet curriculum flagrantly disregards religious freedom, a cornerstone of our nation since its founding. The same politicians censoring what students can read now want to impose state-sponsored religion on to our public schools,” said Caro Achar, engagement coordinator for free speech at the Texas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. “We urge districts to reject this optional curriculum and uphold a public school education that honors the religious diversity and constitutional rights of Texas students.”
Examples of Bible references in the curriculum include a kindergarten lesson on “the golden rule”, which teaches the importance of treating others the way one would want to be treated, linked to Jesus’s sermon on the mount, and a third-grade unit about ancient Rome and Jesus’s life:
According to the Christian Bible, on the day Jesus was born, his mother Mary and father Joseph were traveling to the town of Bethlehem to register for the census. The census, ordered by the Roman government, required Roman citizens to be counted and their names registered. This was used in part to help the empire know how many people needed to pay taxes and is a practice continued by governments to this day.
When Mary and Joseph arrived in Bethlehem, they were told there were no rooms available to rent. They took shelter in a nearby stable, a type of barn where animals are kept. When Jesus was born, Mary wrapped him in pieces of cloth and laid him in a manger, which is a long wooden or stone box used for horses and cattle to eat animal feed. This story of Jesus’s birth in a stable is commonly featured as part of displays put on by Christians even today during the Christmas holidays each year.
The Christian Bible explains that throughout his life, Jesus taught about God’s love and forgiveness, and performed many miracles.
In text messages seen by the Guardian between Chancie Davis, a former school teacher from the Katy independent school district who objected to the curriculum, and state education board member Audrey Young, who voted in favor of the curriculum, Young denied any mention of Jesus in the curriculum and doubled down on her vote.
“You think every single person regardless of their beliefs should be learn about the Bible,” Davis wrote to Young.
Young replied: “In order to be able to participate wholly in a literate society.”
Both Young and the Texas board of education did not respond to a request for comment.
Davis said she began texting with Young after finding her cellphone number on the board’s website. She said she was “shocked” to receive a text back from her elected representative, especially in the middle of the board meeting about the vote.
“I think I was most surprised by her non-professionalism in thinking through the matter, like it was a done deal already,” Davis said. “She wasn’t ready to listen to anything.”
Davis said “there’s a clear line between separation of church and state, and I think that this crosses that, and it’s a slippery slope in our public schools, and all students deserve to be represented, not just the Christian sect”.
Bryan Henry, a local Cypress, Texas, parent and public school advocate affiliated with Cypress Families for Public Schools, said the curriculum was “just the latest example of Texas being a laboratory for Christian nationalism”.
Henry added: “What I find particularly insidious about it is the fact that they are going to incentivize school districts to adopt the curriculum in exchange for extra funding at a time when the state government is starving public schools of needed money because they want vouchers for private Christian schools.”
A spokesperson for the Texas State Teachers Association, which is affiliated with the US’s largest labor union, the National Education Association, told the Guardian: “The implementation of this curriculum means grade-school children in schools that adopt the curriculum will receive what amounts to Christian Sunday school lessons in their public schools, something our public education system was not intended to provide and should not provide.
“Students who observe religions other than Christianity, in effect, will be discriminated against because their own religions will be all but ignored.”
Darcy Hirsh, the director of government relations and advocacy at the National Council of Jewish Women, the US’s oldest Jewish feminist civil rights organization, said in an interview with the Guardian: “As a Jewish organization, maintaining the separation of church and state is a key priority for us as it is the cornerstone of our democracy.”
Hirsh added she was “devastated” about “the Texas school board’s decision today to implement a curriculum that is based in the Bible, and even one specific interpretation of the Bible”.
Putin says Russia will use experimental missile again after Ukraine strike | Russia
Vladimir Putin has vowed to launch more strikes using an experimental intermediate-range ballistic missile as Ukraine decried the testing of the nuclear-capable weapon on its territory as an “international crime”.
Speaking at a defence conference on Friday, Putin contested US claims that Russia possessed only a “handful” of the high-speed ballistic missiles, saying that the military had enough to continue to test them in “combat conditions”.
“The tests [of the missile system] have passed successfully, and I congratulate you all on that,” Putin said, according to the Interfax news agency. “As has been said already, we’ll be continuing these tests, including in combat conditions, depending on the situation and nature of threats being posed to Russia’s security, especially considering that we have enough of such items, such systems ready for use in stock.”
At the same conference, the Russian strategic missile forces commander Sergei Karakayev said that the missiles could strike targets throughout Europe.
“Depending on the objectives and the range of this weapon, it can strike targets on the entire territory of Europe, which sets it apart from other types of long-range precision-guided weapons,” Karakayev said.
Russia launched the experimental missile, which US officials described as a modified design based on Russia’s longer-range RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile, against a rocket factory in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro. Both Vladimir Putin and US officials have said the missile is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.
US officials have decried Putin’s use of a nuclear-capable warhead but denied that it is a “gamechanger” in the war between Russia and Ukraine, adding that Russia possessed just a handful of the missiles, which its military has named Oreshnik, or Hazel.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy called Russia’s use of an experimental ballistic missile in a strike on Ukraine an “international crime” as he appealed on Friday to countries around the world including the global south to condemn Russia’s latest escalation.
In an address on social media, Zelenskyy said he had already directed his defence minister to hold consultations with allies to secure new air defence systems that could “protect lives from the new risks” of the intermediate-range missiles.
“Using another country not just for terror but also to test new weapons for terror is clearly an international crime,” the Ukrainian president said.
Nato and Ukraine will hold emergency talks on Tuesday to discuss the attack.
The conflict is “entering a decisive phase”, the Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, said on Friday, and “taking on very dramatic dimensions”.
Ukraine’s parliament cancelled a session as security was tightened after Thursday’s Russian strike on the military facility in Dnipro.
Aside from western partners, Zelenskyy called on China and members of the global south, to condemn the strike, saying that the leaders “call for restraint every time, and in response they invariably receive some new escalation from Moscow”.
China and Brazil have proposed a joint “peace plan” that Ukraine has said only emboldens Russia by providing diplomatic cover for the continued assault on Ukraine.
Developing countries urged to reject âbad dealâ as Cop29 climate talks falter | Cop29
Developing countries were being urged by civil society groups to reject âa bad dealâ at the UN climate talks on Friday night, after rich nations refused to increase an âinsultingâ offer of finance to help them tackle the climate crisis.
The stage is set for a bitter row on Saturday over how much money poor countries should receive from the governments of the rich world, which have offered $250bn a year by 2035 to help the poor shift to a low-carbon economy and adapt to the impacts of extreme weather.
That is ânowhere near enoughâ according to poor country groupings and campaigners at the talks. âThis is unacceptable,â said the Alliance of Small Island States in a statement. Climate finance at this level would not enable countries to green their economies to the extent needed to limit global heating to 1.5C above preindustrial levels, they warned. âThe proposed $250bn a year by 2035 is no floor, but a cap that will severely stagnate climate action efforts.â
The Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice said there were growing calls for a walkout, and that âno deal is better than a bad dealâ, as the Cop29 UN climate summit dragged on through Friday night. There is still no end in sight to the talks, which were scheduled to finish on Friday at 6pm Baku time.
Wafa Misrar, the campaigns and policy lead of Climate Action Network Africa, said: â[This is] a profound disrespect to the people on the frontlines of the climate crisis â those losing their lives, homes and livelihoods every day. It is disheartening to witness the lack of commitment from global north countries, who seem willing to disregard our realities.â
Safaâ Al Jayoussi, the climate justice lead at Oxfam International, said: âThis is a shameful failure of leadership. No deal would be better than a bad deal, but letâs be clear â there is only one option for those grappling with the harshest impacts of climate collapse: trillions, not billions, in public and grants-based finance.â
According to the draft text of a deal circulated on Thursday, developing countries would receive at least $1.3tn a year in climate finance by 2035, which is in line with the demands most submitted in advance of this two-week conference.
But poor nations wanted much more of that headline finance to come directly from rich countries, preferably in the form of grants rather than loans. They said the offer of $250bn coming from rich countries, with few safeguards over how much would come without strings attached, was much too little.
On Friday evening Greta Thunberg called the current draft âa complete disasterâ. âThe people in power are yet again about to agree to a death sentence to the countless people whose lives have been or will be ruined by the climate crisis,â she posted on X. âThe current text is full of false solutions and empty promises. The money from the global north countries needed to pay back their climate debt is still nowhere to be seen.â
The offer from developed countries is supposed to form the inner core of a âlayeredâ finance settlement, accompanied by a middle layer of new forms of finance such as new taxes on fossil fuels and high-carbon activities, carbon trading and âinnovativeâ forms of finance; and an outermost layer of investment from the private sector, into projects such as solar and windfarms.
These layers would add up to $1.3tn a year, which is the amount that leading economists have calculated is needed in external finance for developing countries to tackle the climate crisis. Many activists have demanded more â figures of $5tn or $7tn a year have been put forward by some groups, based on the historic responsibilities of developed countries for causing the climate crisis.
But rich countries are facing their own budgetary crises, with rampant inflation, wars including the one in Ukraine, the aftermath of the Covid pandemic and threats from rightwing parties to weaponise the climate crisis as an issue.
after newsletter promotion
Steven Guilbeault, Canadaâs climate minister and a former green activist, said: âCountries like Canada are not denying what the needs are. We have made it clear that we cannot get to trillions with public dollars. Itâs simply not possible.â
Most countries â and campaigners â know this, he added. âSome people are being disingenuous. They have known from the beginning that we would get to trillions with public money. Our public would not allow that to happen, but we can mobilise more than we have so far and thatâs exactly what we are doing.â
Azerbaijan, which holds the presidency of the talks, also came in for criticism on Friday as countries complained that draft texts of an agreement left out and played down a key commitment to âtransition away from fossil fuelsâ.
That commitment was made a year ago at the Cop28 talks in Dubai, but some countries want to unpick it. Saudi Arabia has been widely accused of taking the commitment out of drafts at every opportunity, to the fury of developed countries that want to build on the commitment to force a global shift away from high-carbon energy.
Yalchin Rafiyev, the chief negotiator for Azerbaijan, responded by accusing rich countries of failing to come up with an adequate offer of climate finance. âIt [the $250bn] doesnât correspond to a fair and ambitious goal,â he said.
Delegates expect a further draft text on Saturday morning. That will also be subject to fierce negotiations and potentially further iterations.
MMA fighter Conor McGregor raped woman at Dublin hotel, jury finds in civil trial | Ireland
A jury at a civil trial at Ireland’s high court has found that the Irish martial arts fighter Conor McGregor assaulted a woman who had accused him of raping her at a hotel in Dublin in December 2018.
McGregor was ordered pay nearly €250,000 (£210,000) in damages to Nikita Hand, who is also known as Nikita Ní Laimhín.
Lawyers for Hand had accused 36-year-old McGregor of brutally raping and battering her after she invited him to join her and a friend at a work Christmas party in the Beacon Hotel in Dublin in December 2018.
Hand also alleged that another man, James Lawrence, who joined the party, sexually assaulted her. The jury found that Lawrence did not assault Hand.
Speaking outside the court after the verdict, Hand, 35, told reporters that she was “overwhelmed” by the support she had received. She thanked her family and a staff member from a rape crisis centre who had sat beside her throughout “this entire period”, including the two-week trial.
“I want to show [her daughter] Freya and every other girl and boy that you can stand up for yourself if something happens to you, no matter who the person, is and justice will be served,” Hand said.
“To all the victims of sexual assault, I hope my story is a reminder that no matter how afraid you might be, speak up, you have a voice and keep on fighting for justice.”
She added that she hoped to rebuild her life now that the six-year ordeal was over.
Hand, who grew up in the same area of Dublin as McGregor, took the civil court case primarily to be vindicated, her barrister had told the court, after the director of public prosecutions decided not to pursue a criminal case on the grounds that there was no reasonable prospect of a conviction.
McGregor doubled over with his head in his hands and shook his head as the jury returned their verdict and awarded Hand damages of €248,603.
There were tense scenes in court as McGregor arrived with a large supporter and family contingent including his partner, Dee Devlin, his mother, Margaret McGregor, and sister Aoife McGregor, along with his boxing coach, Philip Sutcliffe, standing at the back just feet away from Hand.
McGregor had denied the allegations, saying that he had “fully consensual sex” with Hand. He also denied causing bruising to her. He told the court that Hand’s accusations against him were “full of lies” verging on “fantasy”.
Hand had told the court that she and a friend made contact with McGregor, whom she knew, after a work Christmas party. She said they were driven by McGregor to a party in a penthouse room of a south Dublin hotel, where drugs and alcohol were consumed. She said McGregor took her to a bedroom in the penthouse and sexually assaulted her. Hand’s lawyer, John Gordon, said Hand was on antidepressants and “full of drugs” at the time of the alleged assault.
The verdict is likely to renew questions about the difficulty in bringing rape cases to court. Hand’s barrister told the court this week that whatever the outcome she would “always be a marked woman” because she had the “courage” to stand up to the fighter.
Hand had told the jury that she was “absolutely devastated and let down” when the director of public prosecutions told her they would not be progressing her file.
Over the two weeks of the trial, the jury heard harrowing accounts of the incident including a 45-minute recording of a conversation in which a deeply distressed Hand told her then boyfriend about the alleged rape.
The court heard Hand saying McGregor had pinned her down on the bed with all his body weight, and claiming he had put her head in a headlock, mock-choking her three times in a “terrifying” episode.
Think the Cop29 climate summit doesnât matter? Here are five things you should know | Cop29
The UN climate talks in Azerbaijan, scheduled to finish Friday local time, are dragging into the weekend as delegates from nearly 200 countries struggle to reach a consensus on the key issues being debated: a new global climate finance goal and what needs to be done about fossil fuels.
But what is happening in Baku matters, no matter how frustrating a process and inadequate an outcome it may seem. Here are five things you need to know about it.
Donât believe the hype
Cynicism is easy and, when it comes to climate summits, often warranted. They draw tens of thousands of delegates from across the globe to schmooze, monitor, lobby and protest. The talks seem routinely mired in disagreement. News media play a role in amplifying this – conflict rates and nuanced compromise is boring.
The headline stuff isnât great. Wealthy nations responsible for most historic emissions have mostly not acted on the scale necessary. China often seems publicly indifferent about the process despite having a huge presence â a team of more than 1,000 â and continuing to build renewable energy at a historically staggering rate. Saudi Arabiaâs pro-fossil fuel obstructionism is so blatant it now says the quiet bit out loud. More than 1,700 fossil fuel lobbyists turned up alongside a huge presence from clean energy and climate solution interests.
Meanwhile, global greenhouse gas emissions are yet to start coming down, rising an expected 0.8% this year, the planet is racing towards 1.5C of heating in little more than a century, and worsening extreme weather and heatwaves are taking a heavy toll on lives, livelihoods and nature.
Despite all this, UN climate talks still matter â and will continue to even as Donald Trump pulls out, and even though the system is inefficient.
Those who argue the talks are inconsequential or, as one commentator claimed this week, âa cynical exercise in moral blackmail against the westâ, might want to listen a bit more closely to people from the Pacific, the Caribbean and Africa. They argue forcefully that the UN climate process is their chance to have a voice and pressure for action on an issue that, for them, is a matter of life and death.
The UN talks have made a difference. Analyses found the landmark 2015 Paris agreement – and the national policies and commitments that followed â reduced the expected heating this century, sending a signal to major investors that led to a sharp increase in renewable energy. Last yearâs consensus in Dubai that the world needs to transition away from fossil fuels was a further push in that direction.
It didnât mean fossil fuel development stopped, as Australians well know. But it helps set a direction that is building momentum, in part because it now makes clear economic sense.
Climate finance is not charity
The big issue on the table in Baku is climate finance (it has been billed as the âfinance Copâ). Countries are aiming for a deal on a ânew collective quantified goal on climate financeâ, or NCQG. Australiaâs climate change minister, Chris Bowen, has been a co-facilitator of what has been a deeply challenging negotiation.
The short version is that the wealthy need to pay to help developing countries build clean economies, adapt to inevitable change and repair the escalating damage from climate breakdown.
This is not charity. The global community has agreed that those most responsible for the CO2 pollution fuelling worsening extreme weather have a responsibility to those who have emitted comparatively little, and in some cases virtually nothing. You broke it, you do whatâs possible to fix it.
As always, there is a fight over who should contribute â and how much. Everyone agrees that rich nations need to stump up much more than they have in the past, but not how much. Australia, along with others, has not nominated a figure, though Bowen did announce A$50m for a loss and damage fund to help the most vulnerable.
Not everyone agrees on the level of responsibility of countries that were classed as developing nations in the 1990s but are now among the biggest emitters â not just China, but the gulf states.
There has been an argument over what other sources of finance could be called on beyond public government funding. Plans include multilateral development banks, new taxes on emitting practices such as shipping and aviation, and private sector investment â though quite how that could be guaranteed is unclear.
Finally, there is the sum. An expert group of senior economists suggested a goal of up to US$1tn a year by 2030 and US$1.3tn by 2035. Campaign groups say it should be US$5tn based on the historic responsibility of developed countries, and that would be easily achievable if fossil fuels were taxed properly.
It is unclear whether this will be resolved in Azerbaijan. A draft deal released by the Azeri hosts late on Friday set a central goal of US$250bn a year by 2035 and a wider target of at least $1.3tn. Some countries responded angrily.
A Cop31 bid stuck in neutral
The Australian government had high hopes of leaving Baku with the rights to host the Cop31 climate summit in 2026 in partnership with Pacific countries. It hasnât happened yet. While it has a clear majority of support among the Western European and Others group of nations that decides the venue, Turkey remains in the race, and it is a consensus process.
Concerted efforts by the Australians, Pacific leaders and others to convince the Turkish to withdraw – including a pointed public call from Bowen, who told the Guardian that âitâs timeâ for a southern hemisphere Cop after a decade in the northern hemisphere – have not been enough.
It is unclear when the issue will be resolved. It could drag on until Cop30 in Belem, Brazil next November.
One leader keen for it to be resolved is the South Australian premier, Peter Malinauskas, who is campaigning to host the event in Adelaide and flew to Baku to get a state of Cop-life and turn on the charm. With his tongue only slightly in his cheek, he told an Australian gathering that if the country did finally secure the rights he had âabsolutely no doubtâ the federal government would âprioritise a place with good wine and Haighâs Chocolatesâ over, say, Sydney or Brisbane.
Nuclear is not really back
Some media outlets went to great lengths this week to claim that nuclear energy was at the centre of Cop29 talks, and Bowen had been embarrassed by Australia not signing up to a UK-US civil nuclear deal.
Take it from a reporter on the ground: this has no basis in fact.
The UK made a mistake by listing on a press release Australia and another nine countries that it said it expected would sign up to a Generation IV International Forum on nuclear. That sentence were quickly removed once it was pointed out that no one had checked and it wasnât true. Instead, Australia will continue as an observer, as it was in the forumâs previous iteration.
The slip-up had no obvious impact on the relationship between the countries â Bowen and his UK counterpart, Ed Miliband, held an event to sign a renewable energy agreement shortly after the story broke. And nuclear has been barely visible as an issue at the talks.Â
Thirty-one countries have signed up to a side pledge to triple nuclear power capacity by 2050, with six new countries joining at Cop29. But the global focus is renewable energy. Cop28 agreed global investment in renewables needs to be tripled by 2030, and the bulk of the non-fossil energy investment is going that way.
Only one country that signed the pledge to triple nuclear, Slovakia, has started work on planning a new plant in the past year. And those plants take about 20 years to build.
The world is here – for good and bad
At a time of global disruption, UN climate summits are a remarkable collection of people from across the planet. Thatâs no a bad thing, though views on who should be welcomed differ.
The Taliban have been here. So have representatives from both Israel and Palestine.
There were at least 10 ministers from the Pacific on the ground in the final week, and several presidents and prime ministers turning up for the leadersâ section (something Anthony Albanese is yet to do since becoming PM).
The Biden administration is here, led by Bill Clintonâs former chief-of-staff John Podesta, but more subdued than previous years. Representatives for Donald Trump â not yet president, definitely not interested in working to address the climate crisis â are not. His election was discussed and will clearly have an impact, but has not been the black cloud some expected.
Argentina was here despite its president, Trumpâs ally Javier Milei, blustering about pulling his country out of the Paris agreement. Perhaps the risk of companies cutting off clean energy investment means more than ideology.
There were advocates for every energy source going, but particularly solar and wind. Malcolm Turnbull attended on behalf of the International Hydropower Association and Matt Kean for the Climate Change Authority. Climate denying senator Ralph Babet showed up briefly, paid for by the nuclear spruiking Coalition for Conservation.
Russia had a major visual presence despite saying little publicly during the talks. Some of its outreach was focused on the young – visitors to its pavilion were offered an âecological colouring book for childrenâ produced by the Russian majority state-owned gas company Gazprom.
Ukraineâs pavilion told a much more powerful story. Its striking white walls, made of recycled paper and living seeds, detailed the devastating impact of Russiaâs invasion on its environment, including 14 documented cases of ecocide and an estimated cost of US$71bn. Nearly 900sq km of Ukraine forest have burned, six of the countryâs nuclear reactors are occupied, and last yearâs destruction of the Kahovka hydroelectric dam released enough to hydrate the world for two days.
But the overarching message on Ukraineâs pavilion walls was one of resilience – that âdespite Russian terror, which is jeopardising the ecosystems, energy and food security of the whole world, Ukraine remains a reliable partner in achieving global climate goalsâ.
Even in unlikely places, the effort pushes on.
âItâs really an honourâ: people of oil-rich Azerbaijan welcome climate summit | Cop29
Oil runs deep in Azerbaijan, the host country of this yearâs UN climate summit. Just 30 minutes south-west of the Cop29 conference centre lies the site of the worldâs first industrially drilled oil well, opened in 1846.
Just metres away sit a handful of operating oil wells, nodding away. The Guardian spoke to an employee of Azerbaijanâs state-owned oil and gas company, Socar, who was working on one of the wells. Asked what oil meant for Azerbaijan, the 47-year-old worker said: âToo much!â
âItâs our future,â he said through an interpreter. âAnd our green future.â
Can oil be green? The worker said Socar had made efforts to clean up its oil supply, which he described as a âgood thingâ. Asked what he made of efforts to reduce fossil fuel usage, he said that in 100 years he imagined the world would be far less reliant on oil.
The worker, who has been at Socar for 15 years, said he had seen the impacts of the climate crisis first-hand. Bakuâs winters had warmed considerably, he said, and snow was arriving later in winter across the country.
Azerbaijanâs economy has long been dependent on its oil reserves. Nothing makes this clearer than the Villa Petrolea. The compound, named for the Latin for âoil estateâ, is where the Nobel brothers once lived and worked. In the late 1800s, Baku produced half of the worldâs petroleum, and the Nobel brothersâ company, Branobel Oil, was responsible for most of that supply.
One of the Nobel brothers, Alfred, was also the inventor of dynamite, earning him the nickname âMerchant of Deathâ. To restore his legacy, he used his fortune from his shares in the oil company to create the Nobel prize. It is estimated that about 25% of the funds used to start the Nobel Foundation came from Branobel money.
Today, the Nobel brothersâ home is a museum â but a âlivingâ one, since oil companies still hold events in its meeting room, a Villa Petrolea tour guide said.
The Nobels are not the only historical figures whose petroleum fortunes powered Azerbaijan. Oil money looms large over Baku. Towering over the city is the House of Hajinski, a striking five-storey building that was once the residence of the oil baron Isa Bey Hajinski. The oil magnate and philanthropist also owned a paraffin refinery in the sector of Baku known as Black City. The first owner of an automobile in Baku, Hajinski paid to build the nearby boulevard in 1901.
Other petroleum bosses also shaped Baku. The âcoolest oil baronâ was Zeynalabdin Taghiyev, said the Guardianâs tour guide, who is the tourism manager for Bakuâs old city. Taghiyev paid to have the Middle Eastâs first secular Muslim school for girls built in the late 1800s.
Scientists have long said the swift phase-out of fossil fuels is necessary to avert the worst impacts of the climate crisis. Though Bakuâs economy runs on oil, many residents were excited to see Cop29 held in their city.
after newsletter promotion
One shopkeeper in the old city of Baku said he was âof courseâ familiar with the climate summit, and added that he has been told that this summit was meant to help climate-vulnerable countries. He said there was a need to protect nature âwithout human interferenceâ.
Nearby, two young men sat smoking outside a coffee shop. âItâs really an honour for us to be hosting the event on climate change in our country,â said Azadil Eyvazob, 21.
Fakhri Hasanov, 22, agreed but said the summit should really have taken place in a part of Azerbaijan that is less familiar with the green transition.
âHere in Baku, they are already making progress with bringing in more bikes and electric cars,â he said. âOther people need to hear the message more.â