Some of the earliest examples of purpose-built social housing in the UK can still be found tucked away along central London’s more affluent streets. Built in Edwardian baroque style, the Sutton Dwellings in Chelsea are perhaps an unlikely site for an innovative scheme at the new frontier of Britain’s low-carbon journey.
This winter more than 80 of the estate’s flats will be warmed by heat pumps that tap the warmth of the earth well below the streets of central London.
The scheme’s 27 boreholes burrow deep into the ground directly beneath the estate to where piped water is warmed and fed to a network of “shoebox” heat pumps in a cupboard in each flat. Here, each heat pump – roughly the size of a gas boiler – tops up the heat of the water pipes so that each household can control their own heating, setting it to their preference or using thermostats.
The scheme was completed in late autumn as part of a refurbishment of the more than 100-year-old block of flats, confounding the myths around the UK’s heat pump roll out, such as claims that they do not work in older buildings. It aims to show that heat pumps are not only for newer buildings and that ground source heat pumps are not only for homes with extensive outdoor space.
The developer, Kensa, has completed schemes across the south-east of England, installing shoebox heat pumps in 273 flats across multiple 1960s tower blocks in Thurrock, Essex, and in more than 400 flats across eight tower blocks owned by Enfield council. The Sutton Dwellings project proves that prewar housing can benefit, too.
“Often you see claims heat pumps don’t work, they aren’t suitable for older buildings, there isn’t enough space to install ground source heat pumps in cities,” said Stuart Gadsden, a commercial director at Kensa. “Hopefully, this project can serve as a blueprint for other social housing providers with properties that need decarbonising.”
Heating the UK’s 28m homes accounts for almost a fifth of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, and as temperatures drop this winter, ministers will face rising questions over its plan to tackle this area of the economy. The government is expected to set out the full details of a major funding plan in the coming weeks.
Air source heat pumps are expected to play a big role; according to some forecasts, the outdoor heating units will replace gas boilers in more than 40% of homes. A fifth of homes could have a ground source heat pump for heating and hot water. Kensa believes its network approach may help to upgrade social housing and tower blocks across the country, and could even be adapted to meet the heating needs of entire streets, with boreholes prepared in advance for homes to connect to when they choose to upgrade their heating system.
Making low-carbon heating an affordable – and desirable – alternative to traditional gas boilers will be key to the success of the government’s ambition to create a net zero economy by 2050.
Less than two miles from Sutton Dwellings at the Lillington Gardens estate in Pimlico, residents are deeply sceptical. Here, leaseholders have been warned by Westminster city council that they could face bills of between £30,000 and £66,000 each to replace its buckling heat network. The council has proposed a low-carbon scheme that would cost up to £185m and help the local authority reach its target of becoming net zero by 2030.
In the 1960s, the Lillington heat network was once at the vanguard of low-carbon home heating, making use of the waste heat emitted by miles of underground pipes from the nearby Battersea power station. Since then the network has come to rely on centrally located gas boilers and has fallen into disrepair, leaving residents to battle burst pipes, hot water leaks and sewage spills.
The Labour-led council has blamed “historic underinvestment” for the failure of the heat network and said it is costing £3.5m a year in insurance to manage the “constant leaks that have negatively affected the lives of residents”. The councillor Liza Begum said the council was working with residents to urgently find a long-term solution, and reduce the costs for residents and leaseholders.
The council has joined the Greater London Authority and London councils in a pan-London consortium bid for government funding that aims to help provide low-carbon heating projects and heating upgrades to low-income homes in England.
Huge funding opportunities have been promised by the Labour government but the details of how such schemes will work are not known. The Treasury used its first budget since Labour came to power to promise £3.4bn for the warm homes plan; it is considered the first phase of an ambitious £13.2bn commitment over this parliament to increase the grants available to homes that choose to swap their gas boilers for heat pumps and to upgrade the energy efficiency of Britain’s draughtiest housing stock.
Households connected to communal or district heat networks are often paying twice as much for their heat as those with their own gas boiler, according to Heat Trust. The consumer champion for heat network users has urged the government to help lower their costs by bringing in two reforms: first to extend the energy price cap to include homes connected to a heat network, and second, to provide support to help cover the costs of repairing old heat networks.
Stephen Knight, the chief executive of the Heat Trust, said: “Heat networks will have an increasing role to play in how we heat our homes in cities and towns in the coming decades, as we move away from a reliance on gas boilers. However, we currently see too many examples of poorly designed, inefficient heat networks that generate heat using expensive commercial energy contracts. This often results in high heating bills for their residents as the end consumers.”
Residents in the UK town with the countryâs highest identified concentration of âforever chemicalsâ have instructed lawyers to investigate the possibility of a first-of-its-kind legal claim against the firefighting foam manufacturer located in the centre of Bentham.
In May this year, an investigation by the Ends Report and the Guardian revealed that the rural North Yorkshire town is the most PFAS-polluted place known to exist in the UK. The town is home to the firefighting foam manufacturer Angus Fire.
PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and commonly known as âforever chemicalsâ owing to their persistence in the environment, are a family of about 10,000 chemicals that have been linked to a wide range of serious illnesses, including certain cancers. They are used in many consumer products, from frying pans to waterproof coats, but one of their most common uses is in firefighting foams.
The Law firm Leigh Day has informed Angus Fire that, acting on behalf of residents, it has been instructed to investigate a case against the firm as a result of âalleged PFAS pollution in Benthamâ.
A spokesperson for Angus Fire said: âWe have been advised by Leigh Day that it is under instruction to investigate a potential claim on behalf of one residency. We have not received notice of any legal action.â
In the past 25 years, nearly 10,000 court cases have been filed in the US alleging harm from PFAS exposure. Some of these cases have already resulted in multi-billion dollar settlements. The case against Angus Fire would be be the first ever PFAS-related legal case in the UK.
Charlotte Armstrong, a senior associate solicitor at Leigh Day, said: âAngus Fire state that they no longer manufacture or test any PFAS-containing foam products in Bentham, but that doesnât help the people of Bentham. PFAS are âforever chemicalsâ, and unfortunately that means that the chemical pollution in the area is anything but a historic issue. Our clients and the wider community in Bentham are entitled to fully understand the extent of PFAS pollution in their community, so that those allegedly responsible can be held to account in terms of financial compensation and remediation.â
After the initial investigation, Bentham town council asked Angus Fire to test the environment on Duke Street â a narrow residential road next to the factory â for PFAS.
The test results, which were made available in October, revealed that soil adjacent to gardens on Duke Street was contaminated with elevated levels of PFAS. The land is owned by Angus Fire and is made available for use by residents, who use it to grow food. Residents were advised by Angus Fire to wash and peel vegetables grown on the land, to clean their homes of dust regularly, and to remove shoes before entering their homes.
Residents of Duke Street have said that since finding out about the contamination they felt âtrappedâ.
âAt any point of buying a house, you would want the option to sell it, depending on what you want to do in your life,â said one person, who asked to remain anonymous. âAt the moment, that would be a significant challenge. And with the uncertainty over how long it will take to remediate the land, we are essentially trapped in this situation.â
Angus Fire has offered residents on Duke Street a series of financial âgoodwill gesturesâ.
A spokesperson for Angus Fire said it had âpresented a number of options to residents whose properties border the legacy foam manufacturing and testing areas, which we believe could offer a constructive way forward and which also underscores our commitment to addressing the situation responsibly.
âWe recognise the concerns about potential environmental impacts from historic operations at our facility and regret the inconvenience and worry that this has caused.â
Duke Street residents have expressed concern about the risk of the contamination to their health.
Dr Anna Watson, the director of policy and advocacy at the Chem Trust charity, said that while it was welcome that Angus Fire was âadmitting responsibility for the irreversible PFAS pollution near their site in Benthamâ, it was âheartbreaking to think of people being uprooted from their community, as well as having to deal with the anxiety of potential long-term health impacts from these toxic chemicalsâ.
âThe UK government needs to take urgent action to ban the use and manufacture of these chemicals as a group and be at the forefront of a global PFAS-free economy,â she said.
Residents said they had had no correspondence with local or government officials over the contamination.
An Environment Agency spokesperson said: âWe are working with North Yorkshire council and looking into historic PFAS contamination from the Angus Fire site. Our primary focus is to assess the risk to the environment and provide support to our partners on risk to residents.â
North Yorkshire councilâs assistant director for regulatory services, Callum McKeon, said: âWe continue to work with partner agencies to assess historic PFAS contamination from the Angus Fire site at Bentham. Our key priority is to identify and address the risk to residents and continue to support our partner agencies with their ongoing investigations.â
The Angus Fire spokesperson said: âAngus continues to work closely with independent industry-leading environmental consultants and in cooperation with our UK regulator, the Environment Agency, to better characterise the Bentham site and surrounding areas. These further investigations will help us better understand the extent of any PFAS contamination and assist in determining the remediation required.â
The internationally agreed goal to keep the worldâs temperature rise below 1.5C is now âdeader than a doornailâ, with 2024 almost certain to be the first individual year above this threshold, climate scientists have gloomily concluded â even as world leaders gather for climate talks on how to remain within this boundary.
Three of the five leading research groups monitoring global temperatures consider 2024 on track to be at least 1.5C (2.7F) hotter than pre-industrial times, underlining it as the warmest year on record, beating a mark set just last year. The past 10 consecutive years have already been the hottest 10 years ever recorded.
Although a single year above 1.5C does not itself spell climate doom or break the 2015 Paris agreement, in which countries agreed to strive to keep the long-term temperature rise below this point, scientists have warned this aspiration has in effect been snuffed out despite the exhortations of leaders currently gathered at a United Nations climate summit in Azerbaijan.
âThe goal to avoid exceeding 1.5C is deader than a doornail. Itâs almost impossible to avoid at this point because weâve just waited too long to act,â said Zeke Hausfather, climate research lead at Stripe and a research scientist at Berkeley Earth. âWe are speeding past the 1.5C line an accelerating way and that will continue until global emissions stop climbing.â
Last year was so surprisingly hot, even in the context of the climate crisis, that it caused âsome soul-searchingâ among climate scientists, Hausfather said. In recent months there has also been persistent heat despite the fading of El Niño, a periodic climate event that exacerbated temperatures already elevated by the burning of fossil fuels.
âItâs going to be the hottest year by an unexpectedly large margin. If it continues to be this warm itâs a worrying sign,â he said. âGoing past 1.5C this year is very symbolic, and itâs a sign that we are getting ever closer to going past that target.â
Climate scientists broadly expect it will become apparent the 1.5C target, agreed upon by governments after pleas from vulnerable island states that they risk being wiped out if temperatures rise further than this, has been exceeded within the coming decade.
Despite countries agreeing to shift away from fossil fuels, this year is set to hit a new record for planet-heating emissions, and even if current national pledges are met the world is on track for 2.7C (4.8F) warming, risking disastrous heatwaves, floods, famines and unrest. âWe are clearly failing to bend the curve,â said Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga, an analyst at Climate Analytics, which helped produce the Climate Action Tracker (Cat) temperature estimate.
However, the Cop29 talks in Baku have maintained calls for action to stay under 1.5C. âOnly you can beat the clock on 1.5C,â António Guterres, secretary general of the UN, urged world leaders on Tuesday, while also acknowledging the planet was undergoing a âmasterclass in climate destructionâ.
Yet the 1.5C target now appears to be simply a rhetorical, rather than scientifically achievable, one, bar massive amounts of future carbon removal from as-yet unproven technologies. âI never thought 1.5C was a conceivable goal. I thought it was a pointless thing,â said Gavin Schmidt, a climate scientist at Nasa. âIâm totally unsurprised, like almost all climate scientists, that we are shooting past it at a rapid clip.
âBut it was extremely galvanizing, so I was wrong about that. Maybe it is useful; maybe people do need impossible targets. You shouldnât ask scientists how to galvanize the world because clearly we donât have a fucking clue. People havenât got a magic set of words to keep us to 1.5C, but we have got to keep trying.
âWhat matters is we have to reduce emissions. Once we stop warming the planet, the better it will be for the people and ecosystems that live here.â
The worldâs decision-makers who are collectively failing to stem dangerous global heating will soon be joined by Donald Trump, who is expected to tear down climate policies and thereby, the Cat report estimates, add at least a further 0.04C to the world temperature.
Despite this bleak outlook, some do point out that the picture still looks far rosier than it did before the Paris deal, when a catastrophic temperature rise of 4C or more was foreseeable. Cheap and abundant clean energy is growing at a rapid pace, with peak oil demand expected by the end of this decade.
âMeetings like these are often perceived as talking shops,â said Alexander De Croo, the Belgian prime minister, at the Cop29 summit. âAnd yes, these strenuous negotiations are far from perfect. But if you compare climate policy now to a decade ago, we are in a different world.â
Still, as the world barrels past 1.5C there lie alarming uncertainties in the form of runaway climate âtipping pointsâ, which once set off cannot be halted on human timescales, such as the Amazon turning into a savanna, the collapse of the great polar ice sheets, and huge pulses of carbon released from melting permafrost.
â1.5C is not a cliff edge, but the further we warm up the closer we get to unwittingly setting off tipping points that will bring dramatic climate consequences,â said Grahame Madge, a climate spokesman at the UK Met Office, who added that it would now be âunexpectedâ for 2024 to not be above 1.5C.
âWe are edging ever closer to tipping points in the climate system that we wonât be able to come back from; itâs uncertain when they will arrive, they are almost like monsters in the darkness,â Madge said.
âWe donât want to encounter them so every fraction of a degree is worth fighting for. If we canât achieve 1.5C, it will be better to get 1.6C than 1.7C, which will be better than getting 2C or more.â
Hausfather added: âWe arenât in for a good outcome either way. Itâs challenging. But every tenth of a degree matters. All we know is that the more we push the climate system away from where it has been for the last few million years, there be dragons.â
EU foreign ministers signal support for US decision on missile use inside Russia
Jennifer Rankin
Jennifer Rankin is the Guardianâs Brussels correspondent
The EUâs chief diplomat Josep Borrell has expressed hope that European nations will allow Ukraine to use long-range weapons to strike Russia, following the US decision to loosen restrictions on US-made rockets.
Borrell, who is standing down as the EUâs foreign policy high representative next month, said he had long-believed Ukraine should be able to use western weapons to hit military targets inside Russia, telling reporters.
Iâve been saying once and again that Ukraine should be able to use the arms provided to them in order to not only to stop the arrow but also to be able to hit the archers.
He said he hoped member states would agree on that, suggesting if there was no common decision âanyone will do whatever they believe is according to the need to support Ukraineâ.
France, the EUâs most consequential military power, has not immediately endorsed the US position.
However, Franceâs foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot referred to Emmanuel Macronâs words from May, saying his government would consider this option if it was to allow hitting targets where Russia is âcurrently aggressing Ukrainian territoryâ.
Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp described the US decision as very important, saying:
What I see is that President Putin in general only listens to facts on the ground. And I think therefore that it is very important the US also does not [impose] limitations any more for weapons delivered to Ukraine.
Germanyâs foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said this was not a shift in western policy, telling the media:
The decision from the American side, and I would like to emphasise that this is not a rethink but an intensification of what has already been delivered by other partners, is so important at this moment.
The ministers are attending the monthly EU foreign affairs meeting in Brussels, the last one to be chaired by Borrell, who is ending his five-year term.
Reflecting on his tenure Borrell chided member states for being disunited and slow on foreign policy:
My last call to my colleagues will be, be more united. Take decisions quicker. Every time we took decisions in order to support Ukraine, it took too long.
Key events
Kremlin says any decision to use long-range missiles against Russia would lead to a ‘rise in tension’
The Kremlin said on Monday that if the US allowed Ukraine to use US-made weapons to strike far into Russia then it would lead to a rise in tension and deepen the involvement of the US in the conflict.
Speaking at his regular daily press briefing, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that there was no change in position from what Vladimir Putin had said in September. The Russian president had said he would consider strikes by US-made weapons on Russian soil as the direct involvement of Nato in the conflict.
In response to a question from Tass, Peskov said Russia was only aware of the apparent decision by the Joe Biden administration from reporting in western media.
Asked about recent overtures towards peace by Turkish president Recep Tayyip ErdoÄan, Peskov said that any so-called âfreezingâ of the conflict along the existing frontline was unacceptable for the Russian Federation.
EU foreign ministers signal support for US decision on missile use inside Russia
Jennifer Rankin
Jennifer Rankin is the Guardianâs Brussels correspondent
The EUâs chief diplomat Josep Borrell has expressed hope that European nations will allow Ukraine to use long-range weapons to strike Russia, following the US decision to loosen restrictions on US-made rockets.
Borrell, who is standing down as the EUâs foreign policy high representative next month, said he had long-believed Ukraine should be able to use western weapons to hit military targets inside Russia, telling reporters.
Iâve been saying once and again that Ukraine should be able to use the arms provided to them in order to not only to stop the arrow but also to be able to hit the archers.
He said he hoped member states would agree on that, suggesting if there was no common decision âanyone will do whatever they believe is according to the need to support Ukraineâ.
France, the EUâs most consequential military power, has not immediately endorsed the US position.
However, Franceâs foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot referred to Emmanuel Macronâs words from May, saying his government would consider this option if it was to allow hitting targets where Russia is âcurrently aggressing Ukrainian territoryâ.
Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp described the US decision as very important, saying:
What I see is that President Putin in general only listens to facts on the ground. And I think therefore that it is very important the US also does not [impose] limitations any more for weapons delivered to Ukraine.
Germanyâs foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said this was not a shift in western policy, telling the media:
The decision from the American side, and I would like to emphasise that this is not a rethink but an intensification of what has already been delivered by other partners, is so important at this moment.
The ministers are attending the monthly EU foreign affairs meeting in Brussels, the last one to be chaired by Borrell, who is ending his five-year term.
Reflecting on his tenure Borrell chided member states for being disunited and slow on foreign policy:
My last call to my colleagues will be, be more united. Take decisions quicker. Every time we took decisions in order to support Ukraine, it took too long.
Our video team have this report on yesterdayâs Russian strike on Sumy which killed 11 people, including two children.
France: Ukraine use of French long-range missiles ‘an option that we would consider’
France, which has already provided long-range missiles to Ukraine, on Monday signalled that allowing Kyiv to strike military targets inside Russia remained an option on the table.
âWe openly said this was an option that we would consider if it was to allow to strike a target from where Russia is currently aggressing Ukrainian territory. So nothing new on the other side,â Reuters reports Jean-Noël Barrot told journalists ahead of a EU ministersâ meeting in Brussels.
Local media reports explosions have been heard in Kherson.
An air alert has sounded in Zaporizhzhia.
Borrell: EU should allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia
EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on Monday expressed his hope that EU members could agree to allow Ukraine to use arms to strike inside Russia, Reuters reports.
âIâve been saying once and again that Ukraine should be able to use the arms we provided to them, in order to not only stop the arrows but also to be able to hit the archers,â Borrell said before a meeting with EU foreign ministers in Brussels.
âI continue believing this is what has to be done. Iâm sure we will discuss once again. I hope member states will agree on that.â
In the UK an opposition politician has called on Keir Starmerâs government to allow Ukraine use of UK-made Storm Shadow missiles to strike inside Russia.
Recently appointed shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge of the opposition Conservative party told the GB News channel that permission from the Biden administration to use US-made weapons inside Russiaâs Kursk region was âa very important developmentâ and âvery welcome given the military situation in Ukraine.â
He continued:
I do hope it now paves the way for the UK granting full autonomy to Ukraine in relation to the use of Storm Shadow missiles. Russia invaded Ukraine, a wholly unprovoked, illegal invasion, a dictatorship invading a democracy.
Itâs been the right thing to do, to not be directly involved in Ukraine, but to support them in whatever way we can, in terms of providing munitions thatâs helped Ukraine to check their advance.
He cited the deployment of troops from North Korea as an âescalationâ by Russia, saying âimagine how the Russians would feel if 10,000 Nato troops were now in Ukraine, supporting them. The fact is 10,000 North Korean troops have been deployed into this battle. A totalitarian regime, hundreds of thousands of troops, testing nuclear weapons, is sending those troops out to fight in Europe, alongside Russia. We have to understand which country is in the right here. Itâs Ukraine. We are doing the right thing to support them.â
The foreign minister of the Netherlands, Caspar Veldkamp, has described the decision by the Joe Biden administration that US supplied weapons can be used to strike inside Russia as an âadequate responseâ to the deployment of North Korean troops by Russia.
The US president will allow Ukraine to use US-made Atacms rockets, which have a range of 190 miles (300km) inside Russiaâs Kursk region, where Ukrainian troops have staged an incursion.
Most Ukrainian regions to experience rolling power cuts on Monday
Reuters reports that Odesa, on Ukraineâs Black Sea coast, remains without power. Rolling power outages are also expected today.
Authorities said most regions would face blackouts on Monday of up to eight hours, including the capital Kyiv, with only the west of the country spared.
Ukrainian MP: use of longer range missiles to strike inside Russia not a ‘silver bullet’ to guarantee victory
A Ukrainian MP has said that the use of longer range missiles against Russia is not a âsilver bulletâ that will guarantee victory for Ukraine, and called for a change of strategy from western leaders.
Mariia Ionova, who sits on the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian parliament, told listeners of the BBC Radio 4 Today programme:
Missiles are not the silver bullet against our common enemies, and that is why we are asking all our friends that we need a change in strategy, because our enemies are united and we should stand together as well.
When we are talking about this permission [for longer range missile fire], yes, we appreciate it, but that [alone] will not bring a victory.
[We need] an air shield over Ukraine, more training, more western military instructors in Ukraine, more sanctions, and also more secondary sanctions.
And I think also we should be, and our friendsâ leaders should be, more creative, more brave.
Do not exclude anything. Do not postpone. We understand the procedures in democratic societies, but for us, time is human lives.
Vyacheslav Gladkov, the governor of Russiaâs Belgorod region, has posted to his Telegram channel to report that air defence in the region shot down âseveral enemy dronesâ from Ukraine. âThere are no casualties,â he reported.
Oleksandr Prokudin, head of Kherson region, has posted to Facebook to state that four people were killed and ten others wounded by Russian strikes on the region in the past 24 hours.
Death toll from Sunday’s strike in Sumy rises to 11, including two children
Ukraineâs authorities have revised up the death toll and number of people injured by a missiles strike on Sumy at the weekend. It is now believed that 11 people have died, and 89 people were wounded.
Reuters reports that two children are among the dead, with 11 children among those hurt.
Volodymyr Artyukh, the head of the Sumy military administration, said it was âa tragedy that Russia brought to our land.â
Local media reports that Ukraine is not expecting any power outages in the Lviv region in the west of the country today.
Russian media reports the countryâs security forces have arrested a man on suspicion of preparing explosives and working for the Ukrainian secret service.
Tass reports the FSB in a statement said the man was planning attacks in the Belgorod, Bryansk and Tula regions. The 48-year-old was, the FSB claimed, arrested with bomb-making equipment in Russiaâs Kaluga region, which is to the south-west of Moscow.
Ukraine claims to have shot down 8 out of 11 Russian overnight drone launches
Overnight Ukraineâs air force has claimed it shot down eight of 11 drones launched at the country by Russia, Reuters reports.
Citing a message on the Telegram app, the news agency reports that Ukraineâs air force said it lost three of the drones on its radar, and that Russia also launched three missiles into Ukraine. Two fo the missiles were aimed at Ukraineâs Sumy region.
Biden trying to escalate situation âto the maximumâ with missile decision, Russian lawmaker says
Hello and welcome to the Guardianâs live coverage of the war in Ukraine.
Russian lawmaker Maria Butina has said that the administration of President Joe Biden was risking a third world war if it allowed Ukraine to use US-made weapons to strike deep into Russia.
âThese guys, Bidenâs administration, is trying to escalate the situation to the maximum while they still have power and are still in office,â said Butina, who was jailed in the US for 18 months in 2019 after she tried to infiltrate US conservative groups and the National Rifle Association to promote Russian political interests around the 2016 election. She is now a lawmaker for the ruling United Russia party.
âI have a great hope that [Donald] Trump will overcome this decision if this has been made because they are seriously risking the start of World War Three which is not in anybodyâs interest,â she told Reuters.
Biden on Sunday reversed a ban on the firing of long-range US missiles into Russian territory by permitting them to be used against Russian and North Korean forces in the Kursk region. The US president will allow Ukraine to use US-made Atacms rockets, which have a range of 190 miles (300km) .
President Vladimir Putin said on 12 September that western approval for such a step would mean âthe direct involvement of Nato countries, the United States and European countries in the war in Ukraineâ because Nato military infrastructure and personnel would have to be involved in the targeting and firing of the missiles.
In late October, Putin said that Russiaâs defence ministry was working on different ways to respond if the United States and its Nato allies help Ukraine to strike deep into Russia with long-range Western missiles.
âI guess there are some people in the United States who have nothing to lose for whatever reason or who are completely off the grid so much that they simply do not care,â said Butina.
In other developments:
Ukraineâs president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, appeared to confirm the news of the US policy reversal, though he said any proof about the change in policy would emerge on the battlefield, if and when the missiles are used. âToday, thereâs a lot of talk in the media about us receiving permission for respective actions. But strikes are not carried out with words. Such things are not announced. Missiles will speak for themselves. They certainly will,â Zelenskyy said.
Ten people, including two children, were killed and 52 have been injured after when a Russian missile hit a residential nine-storey building in Ukraineâs northeastern region of Sumy, Ukraineâs emergency services and military have said. âSunday evening for the city of Sumy became hell, a tragedy that Russia brought to our land,â Volodymyr Artyukh, the head of the Sumy military administration said in a post on the administrationâs Telegram messaging channel.
Russia pounded Ukraineâs power grid into the early hours of Sunday in what Kyiv said was a âmassiveâ attack with 120 missiles and 90 drones that killed at least seven people. The attack was the largest missile and drone assault on Ukraine since August and the first big Russian assault since the US election, showing the Kremlin in little mood to compromise after Donald Trumpâs victory.
Ukrenergo, Ukraineâs principal energy supplier, said blackouts and consumption restrictions would be introduced âin all regionsâ from Monday as engineers tried to repair as much of the damage to power facilities as possible. With the harsh Ukrainian winter fast approaching, the country is already suffering from major energy shortfalls.
Polish prime minister Donald Tusk said the attack showed that talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone would not stop the war in Ukraine, two days after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz rang him. âNo one will stop Putin with phone calls. The attack last night, one of the biggest in this war, has proved that telephone diplomacy cannot replace real support from the whole west for Ukraine,â Donald Tusk wrote on X.
Scholz defended his decision to phone the Kremlin, telling reporters on Sunday it was important to tell him [Putin] that he cannot count on support from Germany, Europe and many others in the world waningâ. He added: âThe conversation was very detailed but contributed to a recognition that little has changed in the Russian presidentâs views of the war â and thatâs not good news.â
Ukraine will be âtop of the agendaâ this week at a meeting of leaders from the worldâs most powerful economies, Keir Starmer pledged, though he said he had âno plansâ to follow Scholz and speak directly to Putin. Starmer will meet world leaders on Monday at the G20 summit in Brazil, which the Russian president has declined to attend, sending his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, in his place.
Finland is hosting its first large-scale Nato artillery exercise since the Nordic nation joined the military alliance last year, with live fire drills starting on Sunday. The exercise conducted in the northern Lapland region in November is part of Dynamic Front 25, the largest Nato artillery exercise ever held in Europe, with fire drills in Finland as well as Estonia, Germany, Romania and Poland. The Nordic nation, which shares a border with Russia, joined Nato last year, dropping decades of military non-alignment after Moscowâs invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
About 1,500 supporters of Russiaâs exiled opposition marched through central Berlin on Sunday â led by Yulia Navalnaya and chanting âNo to war!â and âNo to Putinâ â in a demonstration against Moscowâs invasion ofUkraine. The march saw a smaller turnout than expected and was seen as a credibility test for the movement â weakened by years of repression and thrown into disarray since the death of its main leader Alexei Navalny in prison earlier this year.
Russiaâs air defence units destroyed a drone heading towards Moscow, mayor Sergei Sobyanin said early on Monday. âAccording to preliminary information, there is no damage or casualties at the site of the fall of the debris,â Sobyanin wrote on his Telegram messaging channel.
UN chief urges G20 ’leadership’ on stalled climate talks
There are reports from AFP that the UN secretary general António Guterres yesterday called on the G20 leaders who are gathering in Rio de Janeiro to rescue the stalled concurrent UN climate talks in Azerbaijan by showing “leadership” on cutting emissions.
“A successful outcome at Cop29 is still within reach, but it will require leadership and compromise, namely from the G20 countries,” Guterres, who will attend the summit of the world’s biggest economies starting Monday, told a press conference in Rio.
AFP reports: “The annual UN talks in Baku are deadlocked at the midway point, with nations no closer to agreeing a $1 trillion deal for climate investments in developing nations after a week of negotiations.
The talks are stuck over the final figure, the type of financing, and who should pay, with Western countries wanting China and wealthy Gulf states to join the list of donors. All eyes have turned to Rio in the hope of a breakthrough.
“The spotlight is naturally on the G20. They account for 80 percent of global emissions,” Guterres said, calling on the group to “lead by example.”
Climate was an issue advanced by several of the leaders as they converged on Rio.
US President Joe Biden, making a stopover in the Amazon, talked up $11 billion in bilateral climate financing his administration has allocated this year.
He also – in a reference to President-elect Donald Trump taking over from him in two months – declared that “nobody” could reverse the “clean energy revolution” directed by his government.
European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in Rio jointly launched a campaign to boost renewable energies in Africa.
“Tripling renewables globally until 2030 would mean a cut of 10 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions,” von der Leyen said at an event put on by the advocacy group Global Citizen.
She said the EU was increasing investment around the world for the building of infrastructure of renewables, “specifically in Africa” through the bloc’s Global Gateway program – designed to rival China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
The European Union is the world’s biggest contributor for climate financing, most of which goes through multilateral funds.
Chinese President Xi Jinping – whose country is the planet’s biggest polluter – made his own plea for the G20 to step up international cooperation against climate change.
The leaders of the world’s biggest economies should coordinate efforts in areas such as “green and low-carbon development, environmental protection, energy transition and climate change response,” he said in a tribune published in Brazil’s Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.
The G20 should “provide more funding, technology and capacity-building support to Global South countries,” he said.
Brazil is hoping to channel the focus on climate in the two-day G20 summit for it to feature prominently in the meeting’s final declaration.
Marina Silva, Brazil’s environment minister, said it was “fundamental” that the G20 participants “do their homework” and see to it that the COP29 negotiations move forward.
Key events
Adam Morton
Representatives from two Pacific island countries have sharply criticised Australia over its plans for a massive gas industry expansion in Western Australia, saying it could ultimately result in 125 times more greenhouse gas emissions than their island nations release in a year.
Representatives from Vanuatu and Tuvalu called on Australia to stop approving new fossil fuel developments, including a proposal to extend the life of Woodside’s North West Shelf gas facility until 2070.
Vanuatu’s special envoy for climate change, Ralph Regenvanu, said Australia was “not acting in good faith” when it stood alongside Pacific leaders on the global stage and promoted its climate credentials while continuing to approve coal and gas projects.
“As the world’s third largest fossil fuel exporter, the Australian government is exporting climate destruction overseas, including to Pacific nations like Vanuatu, who experience the most devastating impacts of the climate crisis, despite contributing the least,” he said. “This is climate injustice.”
Tuvalu’s climate change minister, Maina Talia, said new fossil fuel developments were incompatible with the global commitment to pursue efforts to limit global heating to 1.5C, agreed as part of the Paris climate deal.
The criticism comes as Australia is lobbying to host Cop31 in 2026 in partnership with Pacific countries. They are vying with Turkey for the hosting rights. Pacific leaders have largely supported the bid for what has been described as a proposed “Pacific Cop”, and have argued it should focus on lifting commitments to cut emissions and support the most vulnerable in the region.
You can read the full story here:
One of the most striking things about attending any Cop summit is the sense of walking through corridors filled with a truly global population, Representatives of different nations take great pride in wearing the traditional clothes of their community, and it makes an immensely powerful and inspiring statement.
Photographer Rafiq Maqbool, from AP, has spent a bit of time taking some striking photographs of a few of the different representatives. We’ll post a few more later.
UN chief urges G20 ’leadership’ on stalled climate talks
There are reports from AFP that the UN secretary general António Guterres yesterday called on the G20 leaders who are gathering in Rio de Janeiro to rescue the stalled concurrent UN climate talks in Azerbaijan by showing “leadership” on cutting emissions.
“A successful outcome at Cop29 is still within reach, but it will require leadership and compromise, namely from the G20 countries,” Guterres, who will attend the summit of the world’s biggest economies starting Monday, told a press conference in Rio.
AFP reports: “The annual UN talks in Baku are deadlocked at the midway point, with nations no closer to agreeing a $1 trillion deal for climate investments in developing nations after a week of negotiations.
The talks are stuck over the final figure, the type of financing, and who should pay, with Western countries wanting China and wealthy Gulf states to join the list of donors. All eyes have turned to Rio in the hope of a breakthrough.
“The spotlight is naturally on the G20. They account for 80 percent of global emissions,” Guterres said, calling on the group to “lead by example.”
Climate was an issue advanced by several of the leaders as they converged on Rio.
US President Joe Biden, making a stopover in the Amazon, talked up $11 billion in bilateral climate financing his administration has allocated this year.
He also – in a reference to President-elect Donald Trump taking over from him in two months – declared that “nobody” could reverse the “clean energy revolution” directed by his government.
European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in Rio jointly launched a campaign to boost renewable energies in Africa.
“Tripling renewables globally until 2030 would mean a cut of 10 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions,” von der Leyen said at an event put on by the advocacy group Global Citizen.
She said the EU was increasing investment around the world for the building of infrastructure of renewables, “specifically in Africa” through the bloc’s Global Gateway program – designed to rival China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
The European Union is the world’s biggest contributor for climate financing, most of which goes through multilateral funds.
Chinese President Xi Jinping – whose country is the planet’s biggest polluter – made his own plea for the G20 to step up international cooperation against climate change.
The leaders of the world’s biggest economies should coordinate efforts in areas such as “green and low-carbon development, environmental protection, energy transition and climate change response,” he said in a tribune published in Brazil’s Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.
The G20 should “provide more funding, technology and capacity-building support to Global South countries,” he said.
Brazil is hoping to channel the focus on climate in the two-day G20 summit for it to feature prominently in the meeting’s final declaration.
Marina Silva, Brazil’s environment minister, said it was “fundamental” that the G20 participants “do their homework” and see to it that the COP29 negotiations move forward.
My colleague Damian Carrington has written about a new assessment of the role of climate change in extreme weather events, which found that it is supercharging heatwaves, floods, storms, droughts and wildfires.
At least 24 previously impossible heatwaves have struck communities across the planet, a new assessment has shown, providing stark evidence of how severely human-caused global heating is supercharging extreme weather.
The impossible heatwaves have taken lives across North America, Europe and Asia, with scientific analyses showing that they would have had virtually zero chance of happening without the extra heat trapped by fossil fuel emissions.
Further studies have assessed how much worse global heating has made the consequences of extreme weather, with shocking results. Millions of people, and many thousands of newborn babies, would not have died prematurely without the extra human-caused heat, according to the estimates.
The analysis comes as residents were evacuated from their homes in New York state due to wildfires, made worse by a prolonged drought over nearly half of the US.
Fiona Harvey
We are now embarking on the second week of talks in Azerbaijan, and critics have been calling Cop29 “stuck”, “logjammed”, “on a knife edge”, and “foundering”. One respected commentator, Mohamed Adow, director of the Power Shift Africa thinktank, said: “This has been the worst first week of a Cop in my 15 years attending these summits. There’s been limited progress … I sense frustration, especially among the developing country groups here at Cop. The presidency isn’t giving any hope for how the world will strike the right compromises.”
This kind of weariness is understandable, especially from people stuck in windowless rooms for 18 hours a day. And the frustration of developing countries is real – climate finance, the subject of this Cop, is a matter of life and death for them, and rich countries are certainly dragging their heels on coming up with the sums needed.
It has been a gruelling week, beginning last weekend with a tedious row over the agenda as countries led by Saudi Arabia – predictably and reprehensibly – tried to sideline discussions of the “transition away from fossil fuels” that was agreed last year, as a way of unpicking that resolution. That led to long nights, even at an early stage.
Added to that, world leaders failed to turn up in the numbers expected, with many of them – Biden, Scholz, Macron, von der Leyen and Trudeau among them – facing troubles at home. The Cop process itself has come under attack, with a group including a former UN secretary-general, a former UN climate chief, and a former UN climate envoy, calling for reform.
But to be too gloomy about these talks at this stage would be wrong. There is a deal to be struck here – and as Germany’s respected development minister Jochen Flasbarth warns today, putting it off to next year means trying to run these talks with Donald Trump in the White House.
This is my 18th Cop – my first was Cop10 in Buenos Aires in 2004, in the distant days when Argentina was a developing world climate champion. From my perspective, the first week of Cop29 has not seen great movement, but nor has the Cop shown signs of falling apart – unlike the infamous Copenhagen Cop15, in 2009 which was already a shambles by the midway point. With negotiations lasting two weeks, progress on breaking down the key obstacles will inevitably be limited, at the halfway mark.
The Cop presidency has made some missteps – rolling out the red carpet to oil companies; the Cop chief executive appearing to offer facilitation of fossil fuel deals to an undercover journalist. But it has not allowed the agenda to spiral out of its control, as the Danish prime minister’s office did at at Cop15, which ended in mayhem. (Though also with a useful deal, which many people forget.)
We must all remember, too, that Cop29 is breaking new ground, so it’s not surprising this is turning out to be tricky. This is the first time there have ever been substantive negotiations on finance at a Cop.
When the totemic target of ensuring $100bn would flow to developing countries each year by 2020 was put on the table, in the last days of Copenhagen, it was done with only brief prior discussion. (The finance announcement took even the UN by surprise – Ban Ki-moon, when I interviewed him just after he had stepped off the plane at Copenhagen, confidently told me that developing countries must resign themselves to leaving Cop15 without promises of cash. When the story appeared, he was promptly shot down by the Cop presidency and told to recant – so he claimed to have been misquoted. He wasn’t.)
Finance ministers don’t even come to Cops, under normal circumstances, or make only occasional brief appearances – these meetings are usually run by environment ministers or foreign ministries. To get an idea of how constrained other ministries are by the finance department, take the speech by UK foreign secretary David Lammy this September. Lammy wanted to announce the UK’s return to climate leadership on the global stage, in contrast to his Conservative predecessors. But he was not allowed to confirm the UK’s pledge of £11.6bn of climate aid, set out under the previous government – because the UK’s finance minister, Rachel Reeves, would not set out the UK budget until the following month.
That constraint is fairly typical across governments – no other ministries may preempt Treasury decisions. So the involvement of finance in this year’s talks is an added complication for many.
Finding the money to put developing countries on to a green path makes sense for rich countries, and for rapidly developing economies such as China, as much as it does the poor. Not only would it prevent climate chaos, help stem climate migration, and prevent the reversal of development in stricken countries – it would also open new markets for countries with low-carbon expertise to sell into. A trillion dollars a year is only about 1% of the global economy, and is less than a third of the amount spent globally on energy every year. These talks are not a lost cause. A deal at Cop29 would lift everybody, and it is there to be grasped.
Good morning! It’s Monday morning, and the negotiations at Cop29 will resume today after a day of rest for everyone concerned.
I’m Bibi van der Zee, and I’ll be anchoring the liveblog this morning, so please send your thoughts and suggestions along to me at [email protected]. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Chinese online marketplace Temu has enjoyed explosive international growth off the back of an eye-catching and often absurdly cheap range of products, but those cut-price tactics have met increasing roadblocks as it seeks to conquer new markets in south-east Asia.
Indonesia ordered Temu to be taken down from app stores in October, a move it said would protect the countryâs smaller merchants. Last week, Vietnam threatened to ban Temu and fellow Chinese-owned fast-fashion outlet Shein by the end of the month, saying they had not been approved to do business in the country.
The flood of cheaper Chinese-made products â often with minimal import taxes â has damaged local vendors and manufacturers, who cannot beat the speed, quality or prices offered online, according to Simon Torring, co-founder of market insights firm Cube.
âTemu has become the lightning rod for every regulator, everywhere now getting worried about whether cross-border import rules should be changed,â he said.
Poom Chotikavan, director of operations at Taksa Toys in Thailand, has struggled to find a local manufacturer to make childrenâs toys because so many suppliers have gone out of business. Nearly 2,000 Thai factories across all industriesclosed and more than 50,000 workers lost their jobs in the last financial year, Reuters reported, in part due to greater Chinese competition and higher costs.
âItâs never been easier to source products from China [so] their sales have just been obliterated,â Chotikavan said. âHow will they survive in this landscape where their clients can just reach out to [Chinese] factories?â
Temuâs Chinese equivalent, Pinduoduo, has operated since 2015, with the global platform launching in the US in 2022 and sweeping European markets the following year. Temu has been expanding its presence in south-east Asia, starting with the Philippines and Malaysia in 2023 then Thailand, Brunei and Vietnam this year.
Rising consumerism from south-east Asiaâs burgeoning middle class has made the region an ideal market, with online shopping sales nearing $160bn in 2024, according to Bain & Co analysis published in November.
That boom came at the right time for Temu to chase international growth, as a slowing Chinese economy saw domestic customers cut back on Pinduoduo purchases, according to Jianggan Li, chief executive at venture firm Momentum Works.
âIn China, the growth is stagnant compared to 2010s and yet itâs very competitive, so players need to find other avenues to grow [such as] overseas markets,â he said.
But the slowdown has also left Chinese factories with spare capacity, pushing Temuâs main suppliers to sell at high volumes and low costs and giving the marketplace a boost as it pushed its way in.
âMind-blowing how cheap it isâ
Just as it has in western markets, Temu paired those cheaply produced goods with massive discounts and an increasingly aggressive advertising campaign, while keeping shoppers hooked through a gamified experience of prize wheels and countdown timers.
It has reached hundreds of thousands of customers, including Chotikavan, who bought a MagSafe iPhone holder for his car on Temu for $3, less than a seventh of the price it would have cost otherwise.
âThe products are getting way cheaper, but the quality is quite decent,â he said. âItâs mind-blowing how cheap it is.â
Itâs the same story across south-east Asia. Woven straw satchels available for $3 on Temu are sold by local vendors in Indonesia for six times the price. Jackets sold in Vietnamese markets for $15 are available on Temu at the same price and with free shipping.
While consumers enjoy the increased access to cheap goods, local businesses want their governments to act.
Indonesia has taken the firmest stance, boosting taxes and banning e-commerce on social media platforms in 2023, which forced TikTok Shop to buy into a struggling local competitor to continue operating. While a ban would protect local manufacturers and higher taxes would add to government coffers, Temu would seek to push its way in regardless, Torring said, pointing to the platformâs repeat applications to enter Indonesia despite constant refusal.
âItâs signalling to other markets: âif itâs easy, we will come. If itâs hard, we will still come. You show us the rules, you show us what we need to do, but we will come,ââ he said.
The US decision to lift a ban on Ukraine using long-range missiles to fire into Russian territory escalates the conflict in Ukraine and will spark an immediate response, senior Russian lawmakers said on Sunday. “The west has decided on such a level of escalation that it could end with the Ukrainian statehood in complete ruins by morning,” Andrei Klishas, a senior member of the Federation Council, Russia’s upper chamber of parliament, said on the Telegram messaging app. Vladimir Dzhabarov, first deputy head of the Russian upper house’s international affairs committee, was quoted by Tass news agency as saying: “This is a very big step towards the start of world war three.”
The remarks came after US president Joe Biden reversed a ban on the firing of long-range missiles into Russian territory by permitting them to be used against Russian and North Korean forces in the Kursk region. The US president will allow Ukraine to use US-made Atacms rockets, which have a range of 190 miles (300km) – a decision being justified by the presence of North Korean troops fighting alongside Russia against Ukraine. Though there was no public comment from the White House, the story first appeared in coordinated briefings to the New York Times, the Washington Post and the news agencies Reuters and Associated Press.
Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, appeared to confirm the news, though he said any proof about the change in policy would emerge on the battlefield, if and when the missiles are used. “Today, there’s a lot of talk in the media about us receiving permission for respective actions. But strikes are not carried out with words. Such things are not announced. Missiles will speak for themselves. They certainly will,” Zelenskyy said.
Ten people, including two children, were killed and 52 were injured on Sunday night when a Russian missile hit a residential nine-storey building in Ukraine’s northeastern region of Sumy, Ukraine’s emergency services and military said. “Sunday evening for the city of Sumy became hell, a tragedy that Russia brought to our land,” Volodymyr Artyukh, the head of the Sumy military administration said in a post on the administration’s Telegram messaging channel.
The attack on Sumy followed a morning of Russia pounding Ukraine’s power grid in what Kyiv said was a “massive” attack with 120 missiles and 90 drones that killed at least seven people. The attack was the largest missile and drone assault on Ukraine since August and the first big Russian assault since the US election, showing the Kremlin in little mood to compromise after Donald Trump’s victory.
Ukrenergo, Ukraine’s principal energy supplier, said blackouts and consumption restrictions would be introduced “in all regions” from Monday as engineers tried to repair as much of the damage to power facilities as possible. With the harsh Ukrainian winter fast approaching, the country is already suffering from major energy shortfalls.
Polish prime minister Donald Tusk said the attack showed that talking to Russian president Vladimir Putin on the phone would not stop the war, two days after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz rang him. “No one will stop Putin with phone calls. The attack last night, one of the biggest in this war, has proved that telephone diplomacy cannot replace real support from the whole west for Ukraine,” Donald Tusk wrote on X.
Scholz defended his decision to phone the Kremlin, telling reporters on Sunday it was important to tell him [Putin] that he cannot count on support from Germany, Europe and many others in the world waning. He added: “The conversation was very detailed but contributed to a recognition that little has changed in the Russian president’s views of the war – and that’s not good news.”
Ukraine will be “top of the agenda” this week at a meeting of leaders from the world’s most powerful economies, Keir Starmer pledged, though he said he had “no plans” to follow Scholz and speak directly to Putin. Starmer will meet world leaders on Monday at the G20 summit in Brazil, which the Russian president has declined to attend, sending his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, in his place.
Finland is hosting its first large-scale Nato artillery exercise since the Nordic nation joined the military alliance last year, with live fire drills starting on Sunday. The exercise conducted in the northern Lapland region in November is part of Dynamic Front 25, the largest Nato artillery exercise ever held in Europe, with fire drills in Finland as well as Estonia, Germany, Romania and Poland. The Nordic nation, which shares a border with Russia, joined Nato last year, dropping decades of military non-alignment after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
About 1,500 supporters of Russia’s exiled opposition marched through central Berlin on Sunday – led by Yulia Navalnaya and chanting “No to war!” and “No to Putin” – in a demonstration against Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine. The march saw a smaller turnout than expected and was seen as a credibility test for the movement – weakened by years of repression and thrown into disarray since the death of its main leader Alexei Navalny in prison earlier this year.
A California-based farm is recalling its carrots, including whole and baby organic carrots, following an E coli outbreak that has infected multiple people across the country.
In a statement on Saturday, Grimmway Farms in Bakersfield said that it has issued its recall of the carrots “that should no longer be in grocery stores but may be in consumers’ refrigerators or freezers”. The recall comes amid 39 reported E coli infections across 18 states, including 15 hospitalizations and one death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The majority of the infections are in New York, Minnesota, Washington, California and Oregon, the Associated Press reports.
Grimmway Farms said that its carrot products may have been contaminated with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, or E coli, a bacterium that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, elderly people and those with compromised immune systems.
Grimmway Farms’ recalled products include its organic whole carrots which were available for purchase at retail stores from 14 August through 23 October 2024, as well as organic baby carrots with best-if-used-by dates between 11 September and 12 November 2024.
The carrots, which were shipped directly to retail distribution centers across the US, Puerto Rico and Canada, have been sold under various labels including 365, Bunny Luv, Cal-Organic, Nature’s Promise, Trader Joe’s, Wegmans, as well as O Organics.
According to the Food and Drug Administration, E coli infections can cause severe bloody diarrhea conditions or the development of high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, and neurologic problems. Symptoms include severe stomach cramps, diarrhea, fever, nausea and vomiting.
The incubation period for E coli in humans can range from 24 hours to up to 10 days, with an average incubation period of three to four days.
Grimmway Farms’ recall comes amid McDonald’s E coli outbreak that has infected at least 104 people – and hospitalized at least 34. The outbreak, which has been tied to onions served on its Quarter Pounders, has been detected in 14 states.
McDonalds has said that it is investing $100m to “accelerate recovery and support the most heavily impacted franchisees” following the outbreak, CBS reported on Saturday.
“A total of $65m will be invested into supporting franchisees who have lost business, targeting those in the states that were most affected,” McDonalds added.
Keir Starmer has vehemently defended the imposition of inheritance tax on farms, as a new analysis suggested farmers are being increasingly squeezed out of the market for agricultural land by wealthy investors.
Amid an battle between the government and the National Farmerâs Union (NFU) over what proportion of farms could be affected by the change, announced in last monthâs budget, Starmer said he was âabsolutely confidentâ that the overwhelming majority of farmers would be exempt.
But the prime minister, speaking to reporters on his way to the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro, suggested this message may not be getting through, adding it was âimportant for us to keep communicating how that worksâ.
Ministers have argued that the change will prevent some investors from avoiding inheritance tax by investing in farmland, much of which is often then barely used to produce anything.
A new Labour analysis has shown a big recent growth in wealthy individuals and institutions buying up farmland across England, with a parallel drop in the amount of agricultural land actively used for farming.
While in 2010, such non-farmers were responsible for less than a third of farmland purchases, by last year this had risen to 56%, according to data collected by the property consultants Strutt & Parker.
According to official statistics for agricultural land use, in the last year alone, 400,000 hectares (988,422 acres) was taken out of use for farming. The analysis is linking this to financial advice that recommends the potential tax breaks of investing in farmland.
A Labour source said the party was âasking rich estates and farms with the highest values to pay their fair shareâ, with the money used to pay for public services that rural communities relied on.
Starmer will be at the G20 summit when farmers protest in central London against the plans, with Tom Bradshaw, the NFUâs president, saying on Sunday that his members felt âbetrayedâ.
Asked about the anger, Starmer noted what he said was significant government investment in farming, adding: âObviously, thereâs an issue around inheritance tax and I do understand the concern.
âBut for a typical case, which is parents with a farm they want to pass on to one of their children, by the time youâve taken into account not only the exemption for the farm property itself, but also the exemption for spouse to spouse, then parent to child, itâs £3m before any inheritance tax will be payable.
âThatâs why I am absolutely confident the vast majority of farms and farmers will not be affected by this. Itâs important for us to keep communicating how that works. Over the £3m, itâs then 20% rather than the usual rate and itâs payable over 10 years.â
Bradshaw told Sky News that he had ânever seen the united sense of anger that there is in this industry todayâ and that he expected thousands of farmers to protest on Tuesday.
He said: âThe industry is feeling betrayed, feeling angry. The government said that this wouldnât happen.â
Bradshaw said farming families who were liable would often be unable to raise the money because of the need to reinvest any profits in production, which would be undermined, harming long-term food security.
There was also, he said, the effect on farmers, particularly older farmers who would struggle to adapt to the new regime: âUnfortunately, there are many who already have lost a spouse, that are in the twilight of their careers, that have given everything to producing this countryâs food, and they have absolutely no way to plan through that. That is the betrayal that Iâm talking about. The human impact of this is simply not acceptable.â
Some farmers have raised the prospect of refusing to supply supermarkets in protest, which Bradshaw said his union did not agree with.
âThat is not an NFU tactic,â he said. âWe do not support emptying supermarket shelves. But I do completely understand the strength of feeling that there is amongst farmers.â
The NFU has warned farmers attending the protests not to bring heavy machinery to the protest, emulating farmers in other countries who have blocked roads with tractors. Starmer said those protesting were entitled to express themselves â but said the police would respond appropriately.
âThey are entitled to express their views. I do understand their concerns. Itâs important I reiterate the support that is going in, it is quite considerable,â he said. âAs to how the protest takes shape and what the response is, that will be a matter for them and the police for how they respond to it.â
It was an England salvo of devastating power, three goals in five minutes early in the second half and it did more than reframe an occasion that had been flat and forgettable up until then. It gave Lee Carsley the win that he wanted on his sixth and final game as the interim manager; one to seal England’s promotion back into the Nations League’s A section. With five wins and just that one off-night against Greece at Wembley, it added up to job well done.
Carsley will hand over to Thomas Tuchel with the team in good health, a new generation also pushed. Carsley had previously given first caps to Angel Gomes, Morgan Gibbs-White, Noni Madueke, Curtis Jones, Lewis Hall and Morgan Rogers. Here, there were two more debuts – for Tino Livramento from the outset and Taylor Harwood-Bellis as a substitute.
What a night it would be for both, especially Harwood-Bellis, who scored with a thumping header with one of his first touches from a Jude Bellingham cross. That made it 5-0. Ireland were long since broken, Harry Kane – who else? – precipitating an alarming crash.
Kane was back in the starting XI after his high-profile omission from Thursday’s 3-0 win over Greece in Athens and, after he laboured dreadfully in the first half, it was his sumptuous pass that got Bellingham in to win a penalty off Liam Scales, the Republic of Ireland defender’s woe compounded when the foul was deemed to be a second yellow card offence.
Kane scored from the spot, his 69th England goal in 103 caps. But this was a night for the next wave because it was not just Harwood-Bellis who found the net for the first time at this level. Anthony Gordon, Conor Gallagher and Jarrod Bowen did likewise, Ireland’s 10 men swept aside.
Newcastle’s Livramento provided the cross for his clubmate Gordon to hook home a volley while Gallagher touched home after Marc Guéhi had flicked on a Madueke corner. That completed the flurry for England but they were in no mood to stop, the remorseless Bellingham teeing up Bowen after a well-worked free-kick routine. Bowen had only just come on as a substitute.
The game had been framed in part by the first meeting between the nations in this group in September, when Ireland were disappointing in the 2-0 loss in Dublin. Few England fans expected anything other than victory here and not only because Ireland were depleted by injuries, missing a handful of likely starters. England would have to wait, the first half a virtual write-off from their point of view.
Heimir Hallgrímsson set Ireland up in a 4-5-1 formation, the captain Nathan Collins – a centre-half by trade – sitting in front of the defence. The idea was to be compact, committed, hard to break down.
Madueke, fresh from his barnstorming performance in the win over Greece, had one early run past two green shirts. His pull-back found its way to Curtis Jones, whose shot was deflected over. Kyle Walker headed off target from the corner and the first half descended into stodgy fare. England were slow to move it in possession, the patterns predictable. With 11 men banked behind the ball, Ireland kept Carsley’s team in front of them with ease.
Kane’s toils in the first half were pronounced. It was unfortunate that Bellingham chose to put him in a foot-race with Collins midway through the period, which he was never going to win. Still, it was a bad look. Moments earlier, Kane had failed to control a clipped ball into the area from Hall; it was all so tight. There was a heavy touch from Kane that led to Scales slamming into him to win a showy tackle and the frustrations seemed to bubble over in first-half stoppage time, Kane throwing Jayson Molumby to the ground to incur a yellow card.
Madueke had been booked earlier for a foul on Callum O’Dowda, with Bellingham’s complaints about the decision earning him a yellow card. He was also booked for dissent in Athens and he will be suspended for England’s next game.
Ireland had shouted loudly for two penalties before the interval, the first when Guéhi had a handful of Evan Ferguson’s shirt as they tussled. The second came when Walker stooped to guide a header back to Jordan Pickford, blocking Sammie Szmodics in the process, who tumbled over. It was risky from Walker. The referee, Erik Lambrechts, did not see enough in either appeal. He could easily have given the first.
That only deepened Ireland’s frustration after the break when England got the penalty to completely turn the game around. Never write off Kane. It has become a truism. It was the captain whose masterpiece of a pass provided the spark, a flat and perfectly calibrated diagonal from the left putting Bellingham up against Scales in the area. He jinked inside; Scales lunged and caught him. When the penalty was awarded, Gordon turned and simply applauded Kane.
Kane did what he does, a little stutter in his run-up before he banged past Caoimhín Kelleher. The red card for Scales was a body blow for Ireland. They would continue to rain down.